Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An in vivo study

Keerthana, S R; Mohammed, Hamdi; Hariprasad, A; Anand, Mani; Ayesha, Syeda

doi:10.4103/jips.jips_239_21

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Five of the thirteen investigations [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ] evaluated the measurement of sagittal CGV; the HCGV in was covered in seven [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. ( Table 1 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Individuals ranging in age from 18 to 75 were included in the research. Only three studies [ 22 , 29 , 31 ] considered CGV values acquired using a non-arcon articulator, while all studies [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ] used an arcon articulator for CGV analysis. In the majority of studies [ 21 , 24 , 25 , 30 , 31 , 32 ], radiographs evaluated significantly higher values compared to the articulator, with panoramic X-rays evaluating higher CGVs compared to their mechanical measurement counterparts.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Bias assessment of individual studies using RoB-2 tool across five different domains [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. …”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

“… Forest plot representing the risk difference of the efficacy of an articulator compared to a panoramic X-ray for measuring CGVs in the 13 studies that were evaluated in this review [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. …”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Guidance Angles Measured Using Arcon and Non-Arcon Articulators and Panoramic Radiographs—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aljohani,

Sghaireen,

Abbas

et al. 2023

Life

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The condylar guidance value (CGV) measurement constitutes an important part of a holistic prosthodontic treatment plan, with horizontal CGVs (HCGVs) and lateral CGVs (LCGVs) being two of the most prominently recognized. This systematic review aimed at evaluating the efficacy of two different types of CGV measurement protocols—articulators (both arcon and non-arcon) and panoramic radiographs. Additionally, it attempts to determine which of the mentioned methods performs better across several parameters. Several important web databases were searched using search terms derived from medical subject headings (MeSH), using keywords linked to “Arcon articulator”, “Condylar guidance angle”, “non-arcon articulator”, “Panoramic x-ray” and “Radiographic examination”, which constituted the first step in the study selection strategy. After completion, the search strategy which initially turned up to 831 papers, eventually ended up with 13 studies. The review and subsequent meta-analysis revealed that panoramic radiographs had noticeably greater efficacy in terms of the CGVs as compared to the articulators in the majority of the studies. Within the articulators, the arcon types recorded slightly higher CGVs than the non-arcon variety owing to the precision of jaw movement simulation in the former. However, further studies are required to validate these findings and establish more precise guidelines for the use of CGV measurement protocols in prosthodontic practice.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… Bias assessment of individual studies using RoB-2 tool across five different domains [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. …”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Guidance Angles Measured Using Arcon and Non-Arcon Articulators and Panoramic Radiographs—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aljohani,

Sghaireen,

Abbas

et al. 2023

Life

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, it is crucial to accurately capture the maxillomandibular relationship. 5 Condylar inclinations are provided by semi-adjustable articulators in two different ways: horizontally and laterally. Hanau's formula can be used to calculate the lateral condylar inclination from the horizontal condylar inclination (HCI), which is determined with protrusive interocclusal records, or it can be done with individual lateral records.…”

Section: Background and Rationalementioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaulation of condylar guidance obtained by digital panoramic radiographic images with that of obtained during jaw relation and try-in using two different interocclusal record material in completely edentulous patients: an in vivo study

Doshi,

Sathe

2024

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background In completely edentulous patients, maintaining the patient's temporomandibular joint (TMJ) health and intraoral components is very important, which can be achieved by an accurate interocclusal record, which can we taken by various materials and also at various stages. Simulation of the temporomandibular joint anatomy and mandibular movements is possible on a semi-adjustable articulator, which is widely used in prosthodontics. Transferring the record on articulator is a critical step in the fabrication of complete dentures so it should be done precisely to reduce chair side time and also to avoid complications for patients. This study examines which material is more accurate and records which stage gives more precision, by comparing the Condylar guidance on radiographs. This is because it is a fairly consistent bony landmark and can be used for correlating with the clinical methods in terms of verification. The objective is to determine the inter occlusal records created during the Jaw Relation stage and Try-in using reinforced wax and Polyvinyl siloxane and compare these values to the condylar guidance obtained by oethopantomogram (OPG). Methods Recording the Condylar Guidance value on OPG by tracing the Glenoid fossa, Articular eminence and the Frankfurt Horizontal Plane. Followed by conventional steps in making complete dentures, at jaw relation and try-in stage. We will record values of condylar guidance with the two different Interocclusal record materials. Expected result It will help the clinicians to gain knowledge about obtaining precise condylar inclination angle by using suitable interocclusal record materials. Conclusions This study will help us to obtain condylar inclination which inturn helps the patients satisfaction as it preserves the intraoral components and health of TMJ.

show abstract

Sagittal condylar guidance angle measurement methods: A systematic review

Lassmann,

Nowak,

Żółtowska

2024

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An in vivo study

Cited by 10 publications

References 22 publications

Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Guidance Angles Measured Using Arcon and Non-Arcon Articulators and Panoramic Radiographs—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Guidance Angles Measured Using Arcon and Non-Arcon Articulators and Panoramic Radiographs—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparative evaulation of condylar guidance obtained by digital panoramic radiographic images with that of obtained during jaw relation and try-in using two different interocclusal record material in completely edentulous patients: an in vivo study

Sagittal condylar guidance angle measurement methods: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About