2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of Elecsys, Atellica, and Alinity assays for measuring the anti-Hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they use different methods and molecular targets for generating and detecting signals and, as a result, may have different levels of diagnostic performance. Some studies reported discrepancies among assays and great variability in cutoff points for predicting TP HCV infection, such as 200 for the Elecsys assay, 19 for the Elecsys II assay, 3-5 for the AR-CHITECT assay, 7-8 for the Vitros assay, 11 for the ADVIA Centaur, and three for the Access assay [27][28][29][30]. Although anti-HCV assays are highly sensitive and specific, their diag- nostic accuracy requires standardization and improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they use different methods and molecular targets for generating and detecting signals and, as a result, may have different levels of diagnostic performance. Some studies reported discrepancies among assays and great variability in cutoff points for predicting TP HCV infection, such as 200 for the Elecsys assay, 19 for the Elecsys II assay, 3-5 for the AR-CHITECT assay, 7-8 for the Vitros assay, 11 for the ADVIA Centaur, and three for the Access assay [27][28][29][30]. Although anti-HCV assays are highly sensitive and specific, their diag- nostic accuracy requires standardization and improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%