“…However, they use different methods and molecular targets for generating and detecting signals and, as a result, may have different levels of diagnostic performance. Some studies reported discrepancies among assays and great variability in cutoff points for predicting TP HCV infection, such as 200 for the Elecsys assay, 19 for the Elecsys II assay, 3-5 for the AR-CHITECT assay, 7-8 for the Vitros assay, 11 for the ADVIA Centaur, and three for the Access assay [27][28][29][30]. Although anti-HCV assays are highly sensitive and specific, their diag- nostic accuracy requires standardization and improvement.…”