2019
DOI: 10.1541/ieejjia.8.386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Electrical and Calorimetric Methods to Estimate Core Loss in Powder Cores

Abstract: The utilization of powder cores for many power electronic applications has drawn a significant amount of attention owing to their attractive magnetic properties. However, because of their low relative permeability characteristics, a precise measurement of the core loss is very difficult to obtain. Imprecise estimation of the core loss may lead to an inaccurate thermal design of power converters. Measuring and calculating the accurate value of the core loss allows the circuit designer to design a more efficient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 and 6 of the past study (29) , when the peak magnetic flux density is Bm = 1 T and the carrier frequency is fC = 10 kHz, the measured results of the iron loss of a ring sample with the two measurement methods agree well. Besides, according to another previous work (30) , the obtained results of the iron loss with the two methods have an average difference of around 5%. We also can see that the PDM presented in (23) has a similar principle to the technique shown in (9) for measuring the IPMSM core loss as used in this paper.…”
Section: Other Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 and 6 of the past study (29) , when the peak magnetic flux density is Bm = 1 T and the carrier frequency is fC = 10 kHz, the measured results of the iron loss of a ring sample with the two measurement methods agree well. Besides, according to another previous work (30) , the obtained results of the iron loss with the two methods have an average difference of around 5%. We also can see that the PDM presented in (23) has a similar principle to the technique shown in (9) for measuring the IPMSM core loss as used in this paper.…”
Section: Other Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…According to the past studies (29) (30) , there are two measurement methods often used for determining the iron loss of a ring sample. The first one is based on the measured H and B such as expressed in ( 4)-( 6) used in this paper, while the other is based on subtracting the losses (such as the copper loss) other than the iron loss ܹ ୣ,୰୧୬ in the ring sample from the input electrical power consumed by the ring sample as shown in (23).…”
Section: Other Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%