2013
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2013/4454.2779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Depigmentation using Tetrafluoroethane Cryosurgery and Gingival Abrasion Technique: Two Years Follow Up

Abstract: Objective: A comparative evaluation of the gingival depigmentation by using Tetrafluoroethane cryosurgery and the gingival abrasion technique -2 years of follow up. Material and Methods:Ten systemically healthy patients who were aged 18 to 36 years were selected for the study. Tetrafluoroethane was used for the cryosurgical depigmentation and the gingival abrasion technique used a coarse flame shaped bur. The presence or absence of pigmentation was tabulated, based on the GPI (Gingival Pigmentation Index). For… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the diagnostic method termined the effectiveness of swab and probe cryosurgery methods in gingival pigmentation removal (26). Kumar et al, 2013, in their study showed that cryosurgery is an effective method for gingival depigmentation (27) The result of According to the findings of the present study, no significant difference was found between the 2 pigmentation removal methods. Farahmand et al, 2014, in their study conducted in Iran, investigating Er:YAG laser (Pd: 120 mj, RR:120 Hz) and cryosurgery methods, found no significant difference between the 2 methods and both were announced effective methods (28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Furthermore, the diagnostic method termined the effectiveness of swab and probe cryosurgery methods in gingival pigmentation removal (26). Kumar et al, 2013, in their study showed that cryosurgery is an effective method for gingival depigmentation (27) The result of According to the findings of the present study, no significant difference was found between the 2 pigmentation removal methods. Farahmand et al, 2014, in their study conducted in Iran, investigating Er:YAG laser (Pd: 120 mj, RR:120 Hz) and cryosurgery methods, found no significant difference between the 2 methods and both were announced effective methods (28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Some of them, such as chemical techniques, are no longer used, 7 but some others such as gingival abrasion are still practiced. 8 Cryosurgery 9 and laser therapy 10 have also been used for treatment of gingival pigmentation with promising results and have met patients' expectations. Traditional methods for treatment of gingival pigmentation including gingivectomy with free gingival autografting, electro-surgery and radio-surgery have disadvantages such as pain, high cost and risks of surgery, including scar formation, gingival recession, trauma to the bone and periosteum and delayed wound healing.…”
Section: Comparison Of Gingival Depigmentation Efficacy Of Two Differmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debido a la presencia de pigmentaciones en esta región, existen distintos métodos utilizados para la despigmentación de manchas provocadas por melanosis como el láser (14-17), la criocirugía (17,18), mediante instrumentos rotatorios (18), ácido ascórbico (19), bisturí (20), injerto gingival libre (21), aloinjerto de matriz dérmica acelular (22), y radiocirugía (23); pero estas técnicas tienen desventajas como el ser costosas, requerir anestesia y/u otro método quirúrgico, y en algunos casos de un postoperatorio prolongado. Muchas de estas técnicas presentan ventajas y también desventajas que deben ser tomadas en cuenta al momento de planear el tratamiento.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified