2021
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Implant Stability, Insertion Torque, and Implant Macrogeometry in Different Bone Densities Using Resonance Frequency Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low PS is sometimes unavoidable in clinics because of anatomical, pathological, and iatrogenic issues. It tends to occur in patients with systematic diseases leading to bone metabolism problems, immediate implantation situations in the oversized implant bed caused by an improper drilling protocol, prolonged inflammation in alveolar bone and fresh extraction socket, or delayed implantation in challenging bone conditions, such as posterior maxillary site [ 11 , 12 ]. To tackle low PS, the bone substitute is routinely recommended in the circumstances described above to create a wedging effect of the implant within the peri-implant defect [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low PS is sometimes unavoidable in clinics because of anatomical, pathological, and iatrogenic issues. It tends to occur in patients with systematic diseases leading to bone metabolism problems, immediate implantation situations in the oversized implant bed caused by an improper drilling protocol, prolonged inflammation in alveolar bone and fresh extraction socket, or delayed implantation in challenging bone conditions, such as posterior maxillary site [ 11 , 12 ]. To tackle low PS, the bone substitute is routinely recommended in the circumstances described above to create a wedging effect of the implant within the peri-implant defect [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Haseeb et al compared the implant stability and insertion torque of two different macro geometry in different bone densities and concluded that lower insertion torques of new implant types help in reducing failure. 24 Gandhi et al evaluated how two different implant designs responded to conventional osteotomy drilling and found that tapered pro implant design offered a better primary stability when osseodensification was used. 25 Insertion torque is defined as the amount of torque required to place the implant into the prepared osteotomy site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It tends to occur in patients with systematic diseases leading to bone metabolism problems, immediate implantation situations in the oversized implant bed caused by an improper drilling protocol, prolonged in ammation in alveolar bone and fresh extraction socket, or delayed implantation in challenging bone conditions, such as posterior maxillary site [11,12]. To tackle low PS, the bone graft is routinely recommended in the circumstances described above to create a wedging effect of the implant within the osteotomy [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%