2018
DOI: 10.1177/1475921718798146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of in situ stress monitoring with Rayleigh waves

Abstract: The in situ monitoring of stresses provides a crucial input for residual life prognosis and is an integral part of structural health monitoring systems. Stress monitoring is generally achieved by utilising the acoustoelastic effect, which relates the speed of elastic waves in a solid, typically longitudinal and shear waves, to the stress state. A major shortcoming of methods based on the acoustoelastic effect is their poor sensitivity. Another shortcoming of acoustoelastic methods is associated with the rapid … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An impulse generator (A DECI, SE25P excited by a Model 600 Pulsar) and a pencil lead-break test were used to generate simulated AE signals. The signals from both AE sources were detected by the second AE sensor ≈1 ms after the first sensor had detected them [31,42,[81][82][83][84].…”
Section: Acoustic Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An impulse generator (A DECI, SE25P excited by a Model 600 Pulsar) and a pencil lead-break test were used to generate simulated AE signals. The signals from both AE sources were detected by the second AE sensor ≈1 ms after the first sensor had detected them [31,42,[81][82][83][84].…”
Section: Acoustic Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The waves are dispersed or attenuated when they encounter a flaw or a crack. The most common types of waves used for detecting cracks and delaminations include Lamb waves [12,13] and Rayleigh waves [14,15]. Embedded sensor-based SHM uses discrete sensors integrated within the structure to monitor its condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former case, which is not the focus of the present work, the most commonly used is the hole-drilling method [11][12][13]. Nondestructive evaluation for stress monitoring has been done more recently with the use of strain gauges [14], which are limited in resolution, and digital image correlation [15,16] which are not viable options for real-time continuous monitoring use, in contrast with the solutions based on ultrasonic information [17][18][19][20] that can be conveniently used for stress estimation as it involves cheap and simple equipment that may operate in a large frequency range depending on the load frequencyband characteristic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%