2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Network Intrusion Detection and Attack Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy is the most commonly used evaluation metric. In the majority of studies, accuracy is supported by other metrics such as recall, precision, and F1 score, but there are also studies [7], [58]- [60] where only accuracy is reported. However, in an area such as attack detection, which suffers from unbalanced data distribution, accuracy alone is not a reliable metric [61].…”
Section: Machine Learning and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy is the most commonly used evaluation metric. In the majority of studies, accuracy is supported by other metrics such as recall, precision, and F1 score, but there are also studies [7], [58]- [60] where only accuracy is reported. However, in an area such as attack detection, which suffers from unbalanced data distribution, accuracy alone is not a reliable metric [61].…”
Section: Machine Learning and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since flows contain mainly information from packet headers and do not extract the payload, they are not affected by the payload encryption and are the ideal candidate for encrypted traffic monitoring. Many research works [3]- [5], [5]- [10] thus use it together with machine learning for encrypted traffic classification to increase visibility and identify encrypted malicious communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies that compared the performances of different ML algorithms on different benchmark datasets concluded that the Random Forest (RF) algorithm has the highest accuracy [8][9][10][11][12]. RF requires a lot of data for training purposes, as any other ML algorithm, so one of the main obstacles is the security of the provided data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%