Comparative Evaluation of PSO, TLBO, and JAYA based Adaptive PI and FOPI Controllers for Vector Controlled Induction Motor Drive

Raj, Abhishek; Khan, Yawer Abbas; Verma, Vimlesh

doi:10.1109/gucon50781.2021.9573705

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…where M, I 1d , and I 1q represent the mutual inductance, d-axis current, and q-axis current, respectively. When the slip-angular-frequency command changes steeply, the q-axis secondary flux fluctuates transiently, and the coupling of the secondary flux occurs [11], [12]. Various control applications, such as autodisturbance-rejection control [13], morel reference adaptive system [14], sliding-mode control [14], [15], and neural networks [16], [17], [18], have been proposed to improve the current response.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

First-Order-Delay-Controlled Slip-Angular Frequency for the Dynamic Performance of an Indirect-Field-Orientation-Controlled Induction Motor-Driving Inertial Load

Nagataki

Kondo

Yuki

2023

IEEE Open J. Ind. Applicat.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sophisticated torque-current control is required in inertial load-drive applications, such as in electric vehicles and electric railway vehicles, over a wide speed range. However, the conventional indirect-field-orientation control (FOC) lacks the current response during the transient response because the conventional feedforward slip-angular-frequency control causes secondary flux fluctuation. Therefore, this article proposes FOC with first-order-delay slip-angular-frequency control, which reduces the secondary flux fluctuation and realizes high-performance torque-current control during transient response. The proposed method was verified through numerical simulation and small-scale model experiments with a 750 W induction motor and an inertial load.INDEX TERMS Induction motors (IMs), motor drives, variable speed drives. NOMENCLATURE

show abstract