2016
DOI: 10.15171/apb.2016.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of RUT, PCR and ELISA Tests for Detection of Infection with Cytotoxigenic H. pylori

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results regarding serum H. pylori IgG, revealed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 79%, but Khalilpour et al found the sensitivity and specificity of serum IgG up to 100%, which was substantially more than us ( 20 ). An investigation in Iran, showed high sensitivity (90.2%) and low specificity (61.1%) of serum H. pylori IgG, which were incompatible with our results ( 21 ). Rahman et al reported sensitivity and specificity of serum IgG against H. pylori about 96.7% and 42.8% respectively, that the sensitivity was more than our findings and the specificity was lesser than our results ( 22 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The current results regarding serum H. pylori IgG, revealed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 79%, but Khalilpour et al found the sensitivity and specificity of serum IgG up to 100%, which was substantially more than us ( 20 ). An investigation in Iran, showed high sensitivity (90.2%) and low specificity (61.1%) of serum H. pylori IgG, which were incompatible with our results ( 21 ). Rahman et al reported sensitivity and specificity of serum IgG against H. pylori about 96.7% and 42.8% respectively, that the sensitivity was more than our findings and the specificity was lesser than our results ( 22 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies considered that one invasive test could be used for diagnosis of H. pylori infection and confirmation of H. pylori eradication after treatment [ 26 , 27 ]. On the other hand, other studies considered that the combination of two positive invasive tests is required for diagnosis of H. pylori infection [ 28 ]. The present study used the combination of RUT and PCR for diagnosis of H. pylori infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, emphasis has been placed on the use of non-invasive diagnostic methods for the detection of H. pylori in pediatric population [ 23 , 24 ]; however, their use is not yet standardized in routine clinical practice. The PCR is among the most promising techniques for being faster, more accurate and specificity [ 16 , 25 ]. This method can detect H. pylori regardless of their viability with high sensitivity and specificity arriving to 95% [ 26 ].…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can detect H. pylori regardless of their viability with high sensitivity and specificity arriving to 95% [ 26 ]. PCR presents greater specificity than the rapid urease test (RUT) [ 25 ]. In addition, PCR has the advantage of identifying H. pylori with a limited quantity of bacterial load allowing to recognize the infection when other tests give negative results [ 27 ].…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%