2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21260-4_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Set-Level Techniques in Microarray Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other pieces of literature, involving set-level techniques, include [41] and [42]. The use of differentially expressed genes is also being currently investigated by us.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other pieces of literature, involving set-level techniques, include [41] and [42]. The use of differentially expressed genes is also being currently investigated by us.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches are currently available that focus on the analysis of gene sets including Gene Set Enrichment Analysis [21] and Gene Set Analysis [7]. Compared to lists of differentially expressed genes, gene sets are more interpretable as they correspond to lists of biological processes [15] and may be thought of as derived sample features that succinctly summarize the original gene expression data [10]. Furthermore, by using gene sets, data sets from multiple platforms may be integrated [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene sets are more interpretable as they correspond to lists of biological processes [15] and may be thought of as derived sample features that succinctly summarize the original gene expression data [16]. Furthermore, by using gene sets, data sets from multiple platforms may be integrated [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%