2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32475-9_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Techniques for Detection of Phishing URLs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study carried out by [36,37] showed that there are several cases of cybersecurity negligence particularly in developing countries, and proposed the need for web-based techniques for improving user side awareness of such threats. In a bid to reduce phishing attacks, existing studies have made use of machine learning techniques [38] and analyzing address-bar based features [39]. Several studies have shown significant improvements in the use of gamification methods for improving learning outcomes.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study carried out by [36,37] showed that there are several cases of cybersecurity negligence particularly in developing countries, and proposed the need for web-based techniques for improving user side awareness of such threats. In a bid to reduce phishing attacks, existing studies have made use of machine learning techniques [38] and analyzing address-bar based features [39]. Several studies have shown significant improvements in the use of gamification methods for improving learning outcomes.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study examined the correlation of URL redirect chains obtained from Twitter, and then a naive Bayes classifier was used on these data, with an accuracy of 90%. An interesting comparative study was conducted by Osho et al [28] to investigate the performance of several machine learning methods for the detection of phishing websites. They found that the random forests method outperforms the existing methods, and achieves an accuracy of 97.3%.…”
Section: Machine-learning-based Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohammad et al contributed to the automation of the phishing URL detection task by systematically extracting URL features and proposing a hierarchical classifier according to the extraction rule [14,21]. The URL features collected and refined for phishing classification were fully exploited for 35 machine-learning-based classifiers, including the unfamiliar methods in Osho et al, and achieved a classification performance of 0.9570 based on the random forest algorithm [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%