2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2006.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of the ground reflection algorithm in FHWA Traffic Noise Model (TNM 2.5)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noise is typically assessed with acoustic models; in the US, the most recent validated version of the Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model (TNM2.5) 33 , 34 uses roads, traffic volumes, pavement type, and mix of vehicle type to output traffic noise as an average day-night sound level: an average noise decibel level over a day with a 10-dB penalty applied from 10:00 pm to 7:00 am. An increase of 10 dB is perceived as being twice as loud, 35 and a typical urban neighborhood residential area in the US ranges from 55 to 70 db.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noise is typically assessed with acoustic models; in the US, the most recent validated version of the Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model (TNM2.5) 33 , 34 uses roads, traffic volumes, pavement type, and mix of vehicle type to output traffic noise as an average day-night sound level: an average noise decibel level over a day with a 10-dB penalty applied from 10:00 pm to 7:00 am. An increase of 10 dB is perceived as being twice as loud, 35 and a typical urban neighborhood residential area in the US ranges from 55 to 70 db.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent validated version, TNM 2.5, (Shu et al, 2007) uses roads, hourly traffic volume, speed, pavement type, and type of vehicle (cars, heavy trucks, light trucks, buses and motorcycles). Specific data we used as inputs include average daily traffic volume obtained from Kalibrate (http://www.kalibrate.com/) and road segments information from HERE (https://company.here.com/).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most traffic noise estimation relies on acoustic-based models such as the U.S. Federal Highway Administration’s Traffic Noise Model version 2.5 (TNM2.5), developed to aid in noise limit compliance of federal highway projects . In Europe, there are several noise models that have been harmonized as part of the “Common Noise Assessment Methods in Europe” (CNOSSOS-EU) among which CoRTN (Calculation of Road Traffic Noise) from England and Richtlinien für den Lärmschutz an Straben) from Germany are the most widely used. , Most acoustic models have been developed and optimized for predicting noise on highways and are usually validated with a limited number of fixed-site noise measurements; however, their accuracy decreases as roadways or traffic volumes become smaller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%