2010
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2010.738.743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Two Nigerian Local Chicken Ecotypes and Their Crosses for Growth Traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The early attainment of sexual dimorphism in crossbred chickens than in pure-bred Tswana chickens is consistent with Kgwatalala and Segokgo (2013) who reported sex differences in body weight in crossbred chickens (50% Australorp x 50% Tswana) and pure-bred Tswana chickens from 10-18 Breed 1 2 3 Crossbred males 12 10 8 Crossbred females 8 8 10 Tswana males 9 10 8 Tswana females 11 10 12 and 14-18 weeks of age, respectively. Higher body weight in crossbred males than females at 20 weeks of age found in the current study is consistent with Adedokun and Sonaiya (2002) and Momoh et al (2010). Adedokun and Sonaiya (2002) reported body weights of 1360±60.2 and 1275±79.6 g in Dahlem Red x Fulani crossbred males and females, respectively and body weights of 1336±60.2 and 1143±46.0 g in Dahlem Red…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The early attainment of sexual dimorphism in crossbred chickens than in pure-bred Tswana chickens is consistent with Kgwatalala and Segokgo (2013) who reported sex differences in body weight in crossbred chickens (50% Australorp x 50% Tswana) and pure-bred Tswana chickens from 10-18 Breed 1 2 3 Crossbred males 12 10 8 Crossbred females 8 8 10 Tswana males 9 10 8 Tswana females 11 10 12 and 14-18 weeks of age, respectively. Higher body weight in crossbred males than females at 20 weeks of age found in the current study is consistent with Adedokun and Sonaiya (2002) and Momoh et al (2010). Adedokun and Sonaiya (2002) reported body weights of 1360±60.2 and 1275±79.6 g in Dahlem Red x Fulani crossbred males and females, respectively and body weights of 1336±60.2 and 1143±46.0 g in Dahlem Red…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Adedokun and Sonaiya (2002) also reported significantly higher body weight in Nigerian indigenous chicken males than females at 15 weeks of age (862±56.5 and 721±72.8 g, respectively) and at 2 0 weeks of age (1191±40.5 and 970±32.3 g, respectively). The body weight of male and female Tswana chickens at 20 weeks of age are however higher than that of Nigerian indigenous chicken at 20 weeks of age reported by Adedokun and Sonaiya (2002) and Momoh et al (2010). Higher body weights in crossbred and purebred males than their female counterpart i s consistent with Mohammed et al (2005) and Pahdi et al (2012) who reported the presence of early sexual dimorphisms in chicken.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It's worth noting that local poultry breeds presented generally low efficiency of feed utilization (Momoh et al, 2010). However, the Tunisian studied population seemed to be enough interesting, since FCR remained far lower than several other local population such as the Gasconne (6.58) and the Bresses (4.59) in France (Tixier-Boichard et al, 2006), the Fayoumi (4.61 at 9 to 14 weeks of age) in Egypt (Azharul et al, 2005) and a Nigerian local poultry (from 5.06 to 6.8 at 12 to 16 weeks, Momoh et al, 2010).…”
Section: Feed Conversion Ratio (Fcr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although native chickens represent a fundamental animal genetic resource in Nigeria, they have remained largely genetically uncharacterized and unimproved ( Oluyemi and Roberts, 2000 ). The Fulani and Yoruba ecotypes have been studied for morphological and morphometrical surveys ( Osaiyuwu et al., 2009 ) and for characterization based on breeding systems ( Momoh et al., 2010 , Sola-Ojo et al., 2012 , Sola-Ojo et al., 2013 , Ige and Salako, 2014 ). The available genetic studies concern only the characterization of adaptive genes ( Ojo, 2002 , Fayeye et al., 2006 , Fayeye and Oketoyin, 2006 ) and not the identification of genetic diversity among populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%