2020
DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_136_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of use of diode laser and electrode with and without two dentinal tubule occluding agents in the management of dentinal hypersensitivity: An experimental in vitro study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limitations of the study were (1) the study was not blinded as no placebo was used, so there may have been a bias patient response and evaluation by the operator; (2) its design is single masked and a larger sample size could have been used; (3) there is no control group, hence comparison is difficult to assess and obtain accurate results; (4) a longer follow-up period would have been better suited to evaluate the long-term effects; and (5) there was no exact measure of the amount of laser energy delivered to a particular area. A scanning electron microscope study conducted by Patil and Gaikwad[ 17 ] showed the highest tubular occlusion with HAP powder plus diode laser and least with electrode, which is further confirmed with clinical studies and will be definitely beneficial for the treatment of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The limitations of the study were (1) the study was not blinded as no placebo was used, so there may have been a bias patient response and evaluation by the operator; (2) its design is single masked and a larger sample size could have been used; (3) there is no control group, hence comparison is difficult to assess and obtain accurate results; (4) a longer follow-up period would have been better suited to evaluate the long-term effects; and (5) there was no exact measure of the amount of laser energy delivered to a particular area. A scanning electron microscope study conducted by Patil and Gaikwad[ 17 ] showed the highest tubular occlusion with HAP powder plus diode laser and least with electrode, which is further confirmed with clinical studies and will be definitely beneficial for the treatment of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, diode laser showed the best results in reducing dentin hypersensitivity. Patil et al [27] analysed dentinal tubule occlusion in vitro by comparing the diode laser with or without hydroxyapatite and strontium chloride agents and observed highest dentinal tubule occlusion in a group treated with hydroxyapatite and diode laser combination. In our study, an 810 nm diode laser was applied for one minute and the occlusion of dentinal tubules was significantly more as compared to the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study presents some clinical limitations, such as the use of dehydrated ex vivo teeth which may have interfered in the final results. Since the specimens were dehydrated, the penetration of AlGaAs laser may have been altered in relation to teeth in the oral cavity [17,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%