2019
DOI: 10.17245/jdapm.2019.19.5.277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of virtual reality distraction and counter-stimulation on dental anxiety and pain perception in children

Abstract: Background: This study evaluated the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) distraction and counter-stimulation (CS) on dental anxiety and pain perception to local anesthesia in children. Methods: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded interventional clinical trial with a parallel design was used. Seventy children 7-11 years old who required local anesthesia (LA) for pulp therapy or tooth extraction were recruited and allocated to two groups with equal distribution based on the intervention. Group CS (n = 35) rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A second detection led to the removal of 14 studies, which left a total of 14 full-text studies for the final selection [2,6,7,9,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] ( Figure 2). Pain levels were assessed in four studies, two in children [20,28] and two in adults [2,21]; anxiety levels in three, two in adults [9,19] and one in children [26]; and anxiety and pain together in seven studies, five in children [22][23][24][25]27] and two in adults [6,7]. Table 2 provides a general description of the details of each study.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second detection led to the removal of 14 studies, which left a total of 14 full-text studies for the final selection [2,6,7,9,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] ( Figure 2). Pain levels were assessed in four studies, two in children [20,28] and two in adults [2,21]; anxiety levels in three, two in adults [9,19] and one in children [26]; and anxiety and pain together in seven studies, five in children [22][23][24][25]27] and two in adults [6,7]. Table 2 provides a general description of the details of each study.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second screening, led to the removal of 14 studies, which left a total of 15 studies, and then we removed seven more: two for treating dental phobia through virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) instead of distraction [ 8 , 9 ], one for being a protocol [ 20 ], one for not measuring DA/Pain as output, although DA is used as a predictor [ 11 ], two for being half-mouth [ 21 , 22 ], and one for lack of enough data for meta-analysis [ 23 ]. This yielded a final sample of eight studies for the analysis ( Figure 1 , Flowchart): seven in children [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ] and one in adults [ 31 ]. It should be noted that six studies in children refer to both anxiety and pain [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 ], one in children only to anxiety [ 28 ], and the study in adults only to pain [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This yielded a final sample of eight studies for the analysis ( Figure 1 , Flowchart): seven in children [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ] and one in adults [ 31 ]. It should be noted that six studies in children refer to both anxiety and pain [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 ], one in children only to anxiety [ 28 ], and the study in adults only to pain [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychological methods include distraction [22][23][24][25][26][27][28], technical changes, such as changing the needle diameter [29,30], and warming and buffering the local anesthesia solution. These methods reduce the discomfort associated with intraoral local anesthesia administration [31][32][33].…”
Section: Not Evaluatedmentioning
confidence: 99%