2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c07868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of Wild and Farmed Rainbow Trout Fish Based on Representative Chemosensory and Microbial Indicators of Their Habitats

Abstract: Wild and farmed rainbow trout were compared with chemical profiling, chemosensory properties, carbon concentration and isotope analyses, 1-and 2-GC/O-MS, GC-FID, and aroma profile analyses. Results were linked with the prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiological profile of the fish sources using multivariate statistical analysis. Fish from natural environments proved to have better sensory properties in terms of fruity, sweet, and citrusy attributes, compared to farmed fish. However, the farmed fish were found … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were statistically analyzed using the IBM® SPSS® Statistics program version 19 and Duncan's Multiple Range Test 29 at 5% at a signi cance level of 5%. Heatmap-based clustering and principal component analysis were performed using the Originpro 2024 program 30,31 . Shelf-life estimation was done 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were statistically analyzed using the IBM® SPSS® Statistics program version 19 and Duncan's Multiple Range Test 29 at 5% at a signi cance level of 5%. Heatmap-based clustering and principal component analysis were performed using the Originpro 2024 program 30,31 . Shelf-life estimation was done 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preparation of data for statistical analysis included testing for outliers, normalization, and z-score calculations where it was found to be normally distributed according to Mahmoud et al [ 47 , 48 ]. A one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test was performed to test the variations between samples based on the means ± standard deviations of three replicates for each of the variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Mahmoud and Magdy and Mahmoud et al, the data was prepared for statistical analysis by being tested for outliers, normalized, and calculated z -scores when it was discovered to be normally distributed. To examine the differences between samples based on the means and standard deviations of triplicates for each of the variables and 10 in another variable, a one-way ANOVA was conducted, followed by Duncan’s test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%