Accurate determination of feeding habits using only conventional dietary analysis is usually difficult, due to both biases caused by prey digestibility differences and to the discrete aspect of the sampling. However, combining conventional methods with stable isotope analysis provides an integrated view of the assimilated diet. Here, we measured stable isotope ratios of carbon (δ 13 C), nitrogen (δ 15 N) and sulphur (δ 34 S) in feathers of yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis nestlings from 4 colonies along the western Mediterranean coast, where the gulls consume different proportions of marine, terrestrial and garbage resources. We collected and analysed chicks' regurgitates in each colony, thereby determining the isotopic signatures in a significant sample of prey. By applying a mixing model to our isotopic values, we compared the information provided by the 2 methodologies. According to direct prey sampling and the particular conditions of the breeding areas, populations with more enriched δ 34 S values consumed a diet richer in marine prey, with lower δ 15 N signatures indicating garbage consumption. The main pattern resulting from the mixing model agreed with direct diet sampling. However, estimated proportions for small-sized prey were controversial, which indicates that small, soft prey items might be underestimated by regurgitate analysis. We conclude that stable isotope signatures and the use of mixing models are useful tools for the rapid assessment of feeding ecology in certain populations. Solving analytical biases should be considered in future feeding studies, thereby saving time and minimising bird disturbance by using an isotopic methodology.KEY WORDS: Carbon-13 · Mixing models · Nitrogen-15 · Regurgitate · Sulphur-34
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherMar Ecol Prog Ser 377: [289][290][291][292][293][294][295][296][297] 2009 because of the intrinsic characteristics of some food types (e.g. pieces of meat and garbage taken at refuse dumps). These methodologies provide only an episodic view of an individual's diet, since each sample represents only a specific feeding event (Votier et al. 2001). Thus, to obtain reliable information about a population's feeding habits, exhaustive monitoring over time is needed (Jordan 2005). However, conventional approaches are still required when we need to identify the taxonomic group of prey consumed. Regurgitated food appears as the least biased method for describing diet composition (González-Solís et al. 1997).The use of stable isotope analysis (SIA) in animal ecology has increased enormously in recent years and has become an important tool to study trophic ecology (Hodum & Hobson 2000, Post 2002. Although SIA does not provide the taxonomic detail achieved by conventional dietary analysis, it avoids prey digestibility biases because it only takes into account assimilated food. Moreover, it provides a ready-made integrated estimate because the assimilated diet for a certain period of time is summarised, dep...