2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:euph.0000013314.04488.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative fine mapping of fruit quality QTLs on chromosome 4 introgressions derived from two wild tomato species

Abstract: SummaryDespite their unsuitability for agricultural production, the wild relatives of crop species represent a largely untapped resource of novel QTLs potentially useful for crop plant improvement. In this regard, previous introgression studies, involving several different wild tomato species, have shown that the long arm of chromosome 4 contains QTLs for many horticulturally important traits including soluble solids content, fruit shape, lycopene content and biochemical composition. However, these earlier stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
17
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously mentioned, this has been reported for fruit shape and weight QTL on tomato chromosome 2 (Eshed and Zamir 1995; Grandillo et al 1999;Lippman and Tanksley 2001). Similar QTL clusters are observed on tomato chromosome 4 (Monforte et al 2001;Yates et al 2004). Several strategies have been used to discriminate whether traits associated with clustered QTL are controlled by a single pleiotropic gene or two (or more) tightly-linked genes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As previously mentioned, this has been reported for fruit shape and weight QTL on tomato chromosome 2 (Eshed and Zamir 1995; Grandillo et al 1999;Lippman and Tanksley 2001). Similar QTL clusters are observed on tomato chromosome 4 (Monforte et al 2001;Yates et al 2004). Several strategies have been used to discriminate whether traits associated with clustered QTL are controlled by a single pleiotropic gene or two (or more) tightly-linked genes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These results suggest that co-localization of QTLs in these chromosomal regions is caused by gene linkage rather than pleiotropic effects, given that if the phenomenon of pleiotropy was the main reason, a constant epistasis between epistatic QTLs controlling various traits would be constant throughout the traits. Similar results, though between the content of soluble solids and weight of fruits, have been observed in F 2 populations of sub NILs derived from the cross between S. lycopersicum with S. hirsutum and S. peruvianum, where Yates et al (2004) found that high co-localization of QTLs controlling fruit weight and soluble solids content in the region of chromosome 4 was caused by strong genetic linkage. Additionally Monforte and Tanksley (2000) concluded that high co-localization of QTLs controlling different fruit variables in the terminal part of chromosome 1 was not caused by pleiotropic effects but by gene linkage.…”
Section: Genetic Variation In Truss Production Over Time Is Affected supporting
confidence: 83%
“…The co-localization of QTLs associated with days to flowering of the first truss and fruit size on chromosomes 1, 4 and 6 has revealed a number of causes of the positive association identified in several types of mapping populations (e.g., F 2 , inbred backcross lines, near isogenic lines and recombinant inbred lines) (Grandillo and Tanksley, 1996;Doganlar et al, 2002;Monforte and Tanksley, 2000;Yates et al, 2004;Sumugat et al, 2010). However, it is not clear if the cause is due to pleiotropic effects or to gene linkage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most probable candidate was 2534_1 that we inferred to map within 1 cM of Tm-2 a (Labate and Baldo, 2005). Tm-2 a was recorded to have been introgressed into line TA496 for improved disease resistance (Tanksley et al, 1998;Yates et al, 2004). Therefore, we hypothesized that locus 2534_1 contained an introgression as a consequence of linkage drag.…”
Section: Diversity Patternsmentioning
confidence: 93%