2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative forefoot trabecular bone architecture in extant hominids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
92
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
9
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The three main hypotheses proposed to explain the relatively gracile skeleton of contemporary humans include: (i) a reduction in physical activity because of increased sedentism and reliance on culture (1-6, 41), (ii) selection for systemic reduction of bone mass in modern humans (14,16), and (iii) attenuation of strain imposed upon trabecular bone because of larger joint surface areas (12,13). The morphological differences between the highly mobile foragers and relatively sedentary village agriculturalists clearly point to physical activity as a major determinant of bone mass in the hip joint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The three main hypotheses proposed to explain the relatively gracile skeleton of contemporary humans include: (i) a reduction in physical activity because of increased sedentism and reliance on culture (1-6, 41), (ii) selection for systemic reduction of bone mass in modern humans (14,16), and (iii) attenuation of strain imposed upon trabecular bone because of larger joint surface areas (12,13). The morphological differences between the highly mobile foragers and relatively sedentary village agriculturalists clearly point to physical activity as a major determinant of bone mass in the hip joint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, it has been suggested that the low bone-volume fraction observed in human thoracic vertebrae and the first and second metatarsals are the result of systemic physiological differences between humans and apes (14,16). These studies do not suggest the mechanism or the function of this systemic gracility, but one potential explanation may be selection for increased tissue economy in hominins (5,(33)(34)(35).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anisotropy in particular appears to be related to principal loading direction (42). Work to date suggests that in some anatomical regions, such as metatarsal heads, humans are characterized by higher degrees of anisotropy (36), but in others, such as metacarpal heads, humans and apes have comparable degrees of anisotropy (32). In both these cases, modern human joints are consistently low in TBF (32,36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative studies characterizing the microarchitecture of trabecular bone have consistently found that humans have a lower bone volume fraction (BV/TV) than chimpanzees. Whether in the humeral head (Shaw and Ryan, 2012;Scherf et al, 2013), first metacarpal head (Lazenby et al, 2011), thoracic vertebra (Cotter et al, 2011), femoral head (Shaw and Ryan, 2012), calcaneal body (Maga et al, 2006), talar body (DeSilva and Devlin, 2012), or medial metatarsal heads (Griffin et al, 2010), humans consistently possess lower BV/TV than chimpanzees. Under the Achilles tendon insertion, however, we found a trend towards slightly higher BV/TV in humans than in chimpanzees, though this trend was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%