2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative gait initiation kinematics between simulated unilateral and bilateral ankle hypomobility: Does bilateral constraint improve speed performance?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modification of lower limb muscle activity in this study may be linked to alteration in the proprioceptive foot and ankle inputs that are caused by constraining the ankle with a rigid AFO. In line with Delafontaine et al (2015), the reduction in AP velocity measured at FC, with respect to control, is greater in the O-St than in the O-Bi condition. Delafontaine et al (2015) suggested that the higher AP CoM velocity in the double-constrained condition is probably due to the better capacity of the brain to deal with a symmetrical change of proprioceptive inputs, as opposed to the asymmetrical somatosensory modification that occurs when only one ankle is constrained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The modification of lower limb muscle activity in this study may be linked to alteration in the proprioceptive foot and ankle inputs that are caused by constraining the ankle with a rigid AFO. In line with Delafontaine et al (2015), the reduction in AP velocity measured at FC, with respect to control, is greater in the O-St than in the O-Bi condition. Delafontaine et al (2015) suggested that the higher AP CoM velocity in the double-constrained condition is probably due to the better capacity of the brain to deal with a symmetrical change of proprioceptive inputs, as opposed to the asymmetrical somatosensory modification that occurs when only one ankle is constrained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In line with Delafontaine et al (2015), the reduction in AP velocity measured at FC, with respect to control, is greater in the O-St than in the O-Bi condition. Delafontaine et al (2015) suggested that the higher AP CoM velocity in the double-constrained condition is probably due to the better capacity of the brain to deal with a symmetrical change of proprioceptive inputs, as opposed to the asymmetrical somatosensory modification that occurs when only one ankle is constrained. The increase in AP velocity in the O-Bi condition could also be caused by adjusting trunk position in order to advance the position of the CoM relative to the base of support and increase forward momentum, which is thought to occur in lower limb amputees (Michel and Do, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The anteroposterior component of the COP initial position was computed as the mean COP value obtained during these 200 ms. APA duration corresponded to the time between the onset rise of the COP trace to the time of swing TO (e.g., Yiou et al, 2011; Delafontaine et al, 2015). The APA onset was detected when the COP trace deviated 2.5 standard deviations from its baseline value (e.g., Caderby et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of knee mobility during GI has received much less attention compared to hip and ankle (Delafontaine et al, 2015). Honeine et al (2016) reported that stance knee flexion during APAs could contribute to the anticipatory mediolateral COP shift and would thus be involved in the maintenance of postural stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%