2021
DOI: 10.1111/mec.15923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative genome sequencing reveals insights into the dynamics of Wolbachia in native and invasive cherry fruit flies

Abstract: Wolbachia is a highly successful endosymbiont that can manipulate host reproduction to ensure efficient vertical transmission from mother to offspring (Werren et al., 2008). Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is the most common form of reproductive manipulation, where crosses between uninfected females and infected males result in embryonic death of offspring. However, if an infected male

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
(191 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The w Di genome is largest among assembled Wolbachia genomes as compared with other Wolbachia from arthropods and nematodes. Previously, the largest Wolbachia genomes were from Folsomia candida (1.8 Mb) 19 , invasive cherry fruit fly Rhagoletis cingulata (1.53 Mb) 20 and embryos of Aedes albopictus (1.48 Mb) 25 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The w Di genome is largest among assembled Wolbachia genomes as compared with other Wolbachia from arthropods and nematodes. Previously, the largest Wolbachia genomes were from Folsomia candida (1.8 Mb) 19 , invasive cherry fruit fly Rhagoletis cingulata (1.53 Mb) 20 and embryos of Aedes albopictus (1.48 Mb) 25 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we utilized HiCanu 18 for the complete assembly of genome sequences from w Di sample, which could resolve near-identical genomic repeats. The assembly resulted in a circular genome of 1.52 Mb which is the largest complete genome among assembled Wolbachia genomes to date among supergroup-B members, except for the complete Wolbachia genome from Folsomia candida ( w Fol) of 1.8 Mb 19 (supergroup-E), invasive cherry fruit fly Rhagoletis cingulata ( w Cin2) 20 of 1.53 Mb (supergroup-A). The genome dataset will enhance our ability to elucidate the interactions of w Di with its D. citri host and associated endosymbionts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…w AlbB diversity has commonly been investigated using a limited number of markers such as the wsp gene and Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) genes with little to no variation observed between isolates from different locations (4244). Whole-genome sequencing provides a higher resolution and has revealed significant genomic differences between closely-related Wolbachia strains (4547). Using this method, we demonstrated the existence of at least two types of w AlbB variants that differ in genome synteny and gene content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that further studies should focus in specific groups of ants to help elucidate the complex history and evolutionary relationship of Wolbachia with ants. Moreover, given the recent studies on Wolbachia genome and the low resolution on MLST approach [24,25], new approaches, such as comparative genome studies, should change substantially our knowledge of this complex history and help understand the real strain diversity and the evolutionary dynamics of Wolbachia and its host.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, to our knowledge there is no further investigations regarding Wolbachia diversity with a focus exclusively on native Solenopsis using MLST approach, which highlights the need to deepen studies with a more precise methodology to reconstruct the evolution and review the diversity of Wolbachia strains in Solenopsis species. Although genomic approches are more robust and suitable to undertand Wolbachia dynamics and the real strain diversity (see References [24][25][26]), the difficulty of accessing many genomes due to the high costs makes MLST a more accessible method for initial surveys of specific groups of host and larger samples. Furthermore, the number of Wolbachia ant genomes are still restricted [26,27], and the MLST has an extensive database for initial comparative analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%