2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60670-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative genomic analysis and mosquito larvicidal activity of four Bacillus thuringiensis serovar israelensis strains

Abstract: Bacillus thuringiensis serovar israelensis (Bti) is used to control insect vectors of human and animal diseases. in the present study, the toxicity of four strains of Bti, named T0124, T0131, T0137, and T0139, toward Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus larvae was analyzed. The T0131 strain showed the highest larvicidal activity against A. aegypti (Lc 50 = 0.015 µg/ml) and C. quinquefasciatus larvae (Lc 50 = 0.035 µg/ml) when compared to the other strains. Furthermore, the genomic sequences of the four str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although most of these determinants are detectable at the genomic level, proteomic assays may provide essential evidence for their distribution. To date, both genomic and proteomic techniques are utilized in Bt studies, although the number of comparative proteomics papers [10,11] is considerably smaller than that of works on comparative genomics [12][13][14][15]. Ideally, the genomic and proteomic approaches should be used in parallel in order to detect virulence factors that are either missing in the proteome screening [16] or misannotated in the genomic data [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most of these determinants are detectable at the genomic level, proteomic assays may provide essential evidence for their distribution. To date, both genomic and proteomic techniques are utilized in Bt studies, although the number of comparative proteomics papers [10,11] is considerably smaller than that of works on comparative genomics [12][13][14][15]. Ideally, the genomic and proteomic approaches should be used in parallel in order to detect virulence factors that are either missing in the proteome screening [16] or misannotated in the genomic data [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the characterization of genes coding pesticidal proteins allowing strain classification, it is the expression of these genes that determines their spectrum of activity [18,19]. In the genome sequence, not all annotated coding regions are expressed, and the genomic approach may not suffice to fully explain the toxicity differences between Bt strains [20,21]. For instance, many pesticidal proteins are cryptic or have insignificant levels of expression [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted to investigate the genomics of mosquitocidal Bt strains [21,[27][28][29]. Interestingly, the proteomic analysis for pesticidal proteins responsible for mosquitocidal activities in Bt strains remains scarce and underexploited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%