2014
DOI: 10.1128/genomea.00140-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Genomic Analysis of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates VRFPA06 and VRFPA08 with VRFPA07

Abstract: Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates harboring acquired drug-resistant genes lead to increased mortality. Here, we have sequenced and annotated the genomes of two multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa isolates and a susceptible P. aeruginosa clinical isolate evidencing divergent antibiotic susceptibilities. Genomic analysis showed insight on the different genomic strategies adapted by P. aeruginosa to combat antimicrobial effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We designed primers for the selected genes found to be most prevalent among clinical studies as well as our own observation from NGS based study and other reports [12–21]. Multiplex PCR Primer designed against drug resistance gene include Group‐1; (ESBL‐MBL) blaTem, blaOXA, blaCTX‐M‐15, blaVim) Group‐2, (blaGes, blaVeb and DIM and AmpC) Efflux pump genes‐ Group‐3 (MexA,B‐oprM); Group‐4 (MexC,D‐oprJ); Group‐5 (Mex X,Y‐oprN) Group‐6 (oprD, nfxB, MexR) primers were purchased from Eurofins Genomics India Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, India.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We designed primers for the selected genes found to be most prevalent among clinical studies as well as our own observation from NGS based study and other reports [12–21]. Multiplex PCR Primer designed against drug resistance gene include Group‐1; (ESBL‐MBL) blaTem, blaOXA, blaCTX‐M‐15, blaVim) Group‐2, (blaGes, blaVeb and DIM and AmpC) Efflux pump genes‐ Group‐3 (MexA,B‐oprM); Group‐4 (MexC,D‐oprJ); Group‐5 (Mex X,Y‐oprN) Group‐6 (oprD, nfxB, MexR) primers were purchased from Eurofins Genomics India Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, India.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From our experience, emergence of culture negative intraocular specimens is steadily increasing, which leads to unwanted avoidable blindness. Hence, the current study designed to target most common betalactamase and efflux pump genes among P aeruginosa reported in literature and our own study experiences [3–5,12–17]. In addition, the current study will assess the coexistence of ESBL, MBL and efflux pump genes among P. aeruginosa isolates obtained from variety of clinical specimens (ocular tissues, blood, urine, pus and etc) using multiplex PCR and the same were compared with Phenotypic methods [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspection of the fully sequenced trpE-trpG genomic regions of 91 P. aeruginosa strains showed a quite similar number of 'mono-tailocin' strains, pyocinogenic for either R (29) or F (31), as compared to 'duo-tailocin' strains, pyocinogenic for both R and F (30). A fourth type of trpE-trpG intergenic organization is found in the multidrug-resistant blood isolate VRFPA06, in which a 30.3-kb DNA sequence with several coding regions of unknown function is positioned between the end of a pyocin R2 cluster and the trpG gene (Murugan et al, 2014). The presence of a bacteriophage P4-like integrase gene flanking the R-pyocin lysis cassette genes suggests a mobile nature for this inserted DNA region (Kung et al, 2010).…”
Section: Genomic Backbones Of Pseudomonad Tailocinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their pigmentation is due to homogentisic acid, which accumulates due to the inactivation of the gene hmgA (pa2009 in P. aeruginosa strain PAO1), which encodes homogentisate-1,2-dioxygenase (Rodriguez-Rojas et al, 2009). Although the inactivation of hmgA may occur in clinical strains by large chromosomal deletion that included hmgA Le et al, 2014), other authors have described single point mutations in this gene (Murugan et al, 2014;Tielen et al, 2014). First, we compared the genomes and phenotypes of a collection of clinical pyomelaninproducing mutants with those of their wild-type parents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%