1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2400943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative genomic hybridization as part of a new diagnostic strategy in childhood hyperdiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Abstract: The detailed definition of karyotype changes associated with hyperdiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a precondition for their exploitation in minimal residual disease studies with fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis (FISH (FISH) showed that all stem lines had been correctly defined by CGH. In eight cases, however, cytogenetic analyses revealed structural abnormalities that were undetectable by CGH. The other discrepancies were mainly due to a cytogenetic misinterpretation of similar sized … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has identified a number of clinically relevant chromosomal abnormalities (Romana et al, 1994;Berger et al, 2003), and allowed the detection of these alterations in patients with failed cytogenetic results, normal, complex or illdefined karyotypes (Harrison et al, 2005). In spite of its limited resolution, chromosome-based comparative genomic hybridization (cCGH) (Kallioniemi et al, 1992) has provided additional genomic information in some groups of patients (Haas et al, 1998;Larramendy et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has identified a number of clinically relevant chromosomal abnormalities (Romana et al, 1994;Berger et al, 2003), and allowed the detection of these alterations in patients with failed cytogenetic results, normal, complex or illdefined karyotypes (Harrison et al, 2005). In spite of its limited resolution, chromosome-based comparative genomic hybridization (cCGH) (Kallioniemi et al, 1992) has provided additional genomic information in some groups of patients (Haas et al, 1998;Larramendy et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies using conventional comparative genome hybridization (CGH) on metaphase chromosomes also have failed in general to detect cryptic abnormalities in hyperdiploid cases. 19,20 In the present study, we utilized high-resolution, genomewide array-based CGH (array CGH) to investigate high hyperdiploid pediatric ALLs. With this technique, imbalances involving as little as 100 kb, that is, far below the detection limit of G-banding, M-FISH and conventional CGH, are seen, enabling the identification of hidden deletions and amplifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Although a large series of patients analyzed by CC suggest that chromosomes X, Y, and 20 are the most frequently involved, this study and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) show that the chromosomes involved in hypodiploidy are not specific. 24,25 High hyperdiploidy with 51 to 65 chromosomes detected by flow cytometry was confirmed by CC or FISH. FC is a quick and appropriate method for identification of numerical aberrations with prognostic value and is useful for patient management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%