2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-07100-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative genomics and community curation further improve gene annotations in the nematode Pristionchus pacificus

Abstract: Background Nematode model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Pristionchus pacificus are powerful systems for studying the evolution of gene function at a mechanistic level. However, the identification of P. pacificus orthologs of candidate genes known from C. elegans is complicated by the discrepancy in the quality of gene annotations, a common problem in nematode and invertebrate genomics. Results Here, we combine comparative genomic screens for suspicious gene models with community-based curation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, comparative genomic screens were combined with community curation to improve the quality of gene annotations in P. pacificus [ 4 ]. Here, the objective is to demonstrate how community curation of a single genome can be used to automatically improve the quality of phylogenomic data from related species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Previously, comparative genomic screens were combined with community curation to improve the quality of gene annotations in P. pacificus [ 4 ]. Here, the objective is to demonstrate how community curation of a single genome can be used to automatically improve the quality of phylogenomic data from related species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of novel gene origin in P. pacificus pointed towards an inflated number of species-specific orphan genes that are most likely gene prediction artifacts recognizing spurious coding signals on the antisense strand of truly protein-coding genes [ 10 ]. Thus, to facilitate more conclusive studies of gene birth processes using purely evidence-based set of gene annotations, species-specific genes without RNA-seq support were removed from current annotations [ 4 ]. Furthermore, other types of gene prediction artifacts such as artificially fused gene models do not necessarily impact BUSCO completeness levels but impair the detection of orthologs [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations