2004
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-4-r27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative genomics of gene-family size in closely related bacteria

Abstract: Comparative genomics of gene-family size in closely related bacteria The wealth of genomic data in bacteria is helping microbiologists understand the factors involved in gene innovation. Among these, the expansion and reduction of gene families appears to have a fundamental role in this, but the factors influencing gene family size are unclear. AbstractBackground: The wealth of genomic data in bacteria is helping microbiologists understand the factors involved in gene innovation. Among these, the expansion and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
46
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Smaller genomes, such as those found in intracellular parasites and endosymbionts, were previously shown to have smaller families [30], [31]. Our results reveal that Reduced genomes had smaller families than could be expected if they followed the same trend as the FL genomes, in particular, they had a significantly higher number of singletons, i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Smaller genomes, such as those found in intracellular parasites and endosymbionts, were previously shown to have smaller families [30], [31]. Our results reveal that Reduced genomes had smaller families than could be expected if they followed the same trend as the FL genomes, in particular, they had a significantly higher number of singletons, i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…CP000113). (12,13), and global studies have borne out the importance of duplications in bacteria (14,15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a remarkable example of xenologous gene replacement (28) in the case of coding for ubiquitous functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%