2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Healthcare Research Outcomes of Novel Surgery in prostate cancer (IP4-CHRONOS): A prospective, multi-centre therapeutic phase II parallel Randomised Control Trial

Abstract: Introduction: Focal therapy (FT) targets individual areas of cancer within the prostate, to confer oncological control with minimal side-effects. Early evidence demonstrates encouraging shortmedium-term outcomes. With no randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing FT to radical therapies, Comparative Healthcare Research Outcomes of Novel Surgery in prostate cancer (CHRONOS) will compare the cancer control of these two treatment strategies.Patients and Methods: CHRONOS is a parallel phase II RCT for patients w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, CHRONOS is a parallel phase II-controlled trial in men with newly diagnosed localized intermediate-high risk PCa. [ 44 ] In CHRONOS arm A patients will be randomized to whole-gland treatment (radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, and brachytherapy) versus focal cancer treatment (HIFU and cryotherapy). On the other hand, patients who enroll in CHRONOS arm B, will be randomized to FT alone versus FT with neoadjuvant treatment, e.g., finasteride or bicalutamide.…”
Section: Ongoing Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, CHRONOS is a parallel phase II-controlled trial in men with newly diagnosed localized intermediate-high risk PCa. [ 44 ] In CHRONOS arm A patients will be randomized to whole-gland treatment (radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, and brachytherapy) versus focal cancer treatment (HIFU and cryotherapy). On the other hand, patients who enroll in CHRONOS arm B, will be randomized to FT alone versus FT with neoadjuvant treatment, e.g., finasteride or bicalutamide.…”
Section: Ongoing Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After screening, 22 studies were excluded: 16 were single-arm case series, four addressed salvage FT, one had an inappropriate comparator, and one had fewer than 50 patients per arm. Eight prospective comparative studies were eligible for inclusion; Table 4 summarises their baseline characteristics [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. Seven are RCTs and one is a prospective NRCS.…”
Section: Ongoing Prospective Comparative Studies Registered In Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven are RCTs and one is a prospective NRCS. Two large RCTs from the UK (PART, n = 800; and CHRONOS, n = 2450) are comparing FT with radical treatment (RP or EBRT or brachytherapy) [40,41] An RCT in China (n = 438) is comparing focal IRE to RP [42]. An RCT in Sweden (n = 250) is comparing HIFU to RP [43].…”
Section: Ongoing Prospective Comparative Studies Registered In Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our aim was to test the feasibility of two parallel RCTs within an overarching strategy that fits with existing patient and physician equipoise. The study protocol has been published [ 1 ] [International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN17796995].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%