1988
DOI: 10.1016/0888-6296(88)90308-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative hemodynamic effects of propofol and thiamylal sodium during anesthetic induction for myocardial revascularization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other studies in cardiac surgical patients suggest that the drug may cause some myocardial depression in addition to vasodilatation [7,9]. This may be secondary to a reduction in coronary artery blood flow consequent upon hypotension [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies in cardiac surgical patients suggest that the drug may cause some myocardial depression in addition to vasodilatation [7,9]. This may be secondary to a reduction in coronary artery blood flow consequent upon hypotension [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the mechanism of the action of thiamylal is similar to that of propofol (9), thiamylal might have contributed to lactic acidosis. Other factors might also have contributed to hypotension and acidosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These make propofol useful in the patient with ischaemic heart disease by reducing myocardial work and hence oxygen requirements. Induction in ASA I11 and IV patients may be associated with greater cardiovascular depression than thiopentone, methohexitone or thiamylal (Kaplan et al, 1988;Coley et al, 1989;Lepage et al, 1991); in the presence of acute coronary ischaemia, propofol infusions depress global and regional cardiac function more than in healthy animals (Diedericks et al, 1989;1990 b & c).…”
Section: @) Etomidatementioning
confidence: 99%