1965
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1965.03090080021005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Hemodynamics During Open vs Closed Cardiac Resuscitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When OCCM is employed within the first minutes of cardiac arrest, hospital discharge rates of up to 50% were achieved 28 . The efficiency of closed chest compressions (CCC) was questioned, 29 and animal experimental research into the topic revealed that under OCCM, cardiac output, cardiac index, coronary perfusion pressure (corPP), carotid artery flow and cerebral perfusion were significantly better than under CCC 30–39 . This correlates with significantly higher ROSC rates, long-term survival, less cerebral tissue damage and better neurological function in survivors 30,31,39–42,71 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When OCCM is employed within the first minutes of cardiac arrest, hospital discharge rates of up to 50% were achieved 28 . The efficiency of closed chest compressions (CCC) was questioned, 29 and animal experimental research into the topic revealed that under OCCM, cardiac output, cardiac index, coronary perfusion pressure (corPP), carotid artery flow and cerebral perfusion were significantly better than under CCC 30–39 . This correlates with significantly higher ROSC rates, long-term survival, less cerebral tissue damage and better neurological function in survivors 30,31,39–42,71 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 The efficiency of closed chest compressions (CCC) was questioned, 29 and animal experimental research into the topic revealed that under OCCM, cardiac output, cardiac index, coronary pressure (corPP), carotid artery flow and cerebral perfusion were significantly better than under CCC. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] This correlates with significantly higher ROSC rates, long-term survival, less cerebral tissue damage and better neurological function in survivors. 30,31,39 -42,71 Case series and observational studies in humans confirmed the experimental findings; cardiac index, 43 corPP, 44 ROSC rate and hospital discharge rate 45 were significantly better in patients treated with OCCM compared with patients receiving CCC.…”
Section: Identification Of Cardiac Arrestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When OCCM is employed within the first minutes of cardiac arrest, hospital discharge rates of up to 50% were achieved [78]. The efficiency of Closed chest compressions (CCC) was questioned [79] and animal experimental research into the topic revealed that under OCCM cardiac output, cardiac index, coronary perfusion pressure (corPP), carotid artery flow and cerebral perfusion were significantly better than under closed chest compressions [80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89]. This correlates with significantly higher ROSC rates, long term survival, less cerebral tissue damage and better neurological function in survivors [47,80,81,[89][90][91][92].…”
Section: Closed Chest Compression and Open Chest Cardiac Massagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effectiveness of both resuscitation methods was found comparable in a number of experimental studies on animal models. The first studies come from the early 1960s and showed significantly higher blood flow in the carotid arteries during OCCM [6,7].…”
Section: Body Of the Articlementioning
confidence: 99%