2012
DOI: 10.1293/tox.25.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Histomorphological Review of Rat and Human Hepatocellular Proliferative Lesions

Abstract: In this comparative review, histomorphological features of common nonneoplastic and neoplastic hepatocyte lesions of rats and humans are examined using H&E-stained slides. The morphological similarities and differences of both neoplastic (hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatocellular adenoma) and presumptive preneoplastic lesions (large and small cell change in humans and foci of cellular alteration in rats) are presented and discussed. There are major similarities in the diagnostic features, growth patterns and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a "comparative histomorphological review of rat and human hepatocellular proliferative lesions", Thoolen and colleagues 1 stated that "there are major similarities in the diagnostic features, growth patterns and behavior of both rat and human proliferative hepatocellular lesions and in the process of hepatocarcinogenesis". I fully agree with this statement, but in view of its far-reaching consequences for the evaluation of rodent carcinogenesis bioassays and the early detection of precursors of human hepatocellular adenomas (HCA) and carcinomas (HCC) I draw your attention to several critical comparisons and conclusions concerning the significance of preneoplastic foci of altered hepatocytes (FAH), called "foci of cellular alteration" in the review.…”
Section: Comparative Aspects Of Rat and Human Hepatocellular Preneoplmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a "comparative histomorphological review of rat and human hepatocellular proliferative lesions", Thoolen and colleagues 1 stated that "there are major similarities in the diagnostic features, growth patterns and behavior of both rat and human proliferative hepatocellular lesions and in the process of hepatocarcinogenesis". I fully agree with this statement, but in view of its far-reaching consequences for the evaluation of rodent carcinogenesis bioassays and the early detection of precursors of human hepatocellular adenomas (HCA) and carcinomas (HCC) I draw your attention to several critical comparisons and conclusions concerning the significance of preneoplastic foci of altered hepatocytes (FAH), called "foci of cellular alteration" in the review.…”
Section: Comparative Aspects Of Rat and Human Hepatocellular Preneoplmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that carcinogenesis has multiple steps starting with benign (initiation) to precancerous (promotion) and finally to malignant lesion (progression), there is a strong mandate for using experimental hepatocarcinogenesis models including mice and rats to give a deep insight into the pathological characteristics during liver cancer development under controlled conditions [49]. Preclinical experimental animal models of HCC enables longitudinal studies that include monitoring of the tumour growth as well as drug uptake and response to treatment.…”
Section: Animal Models Of Hepatocarcinogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to in humans, the cytological criteria of DN in rodents such as nuclear to cytoplasmic changes, nuclear crowding, and hyperchromasia are commonly seen suggesting that DN is the intermediate step to early HCC [49,53]. Rat models of HCC are commonly used because they share features with human carcinomas at different time points [54].…”
Section: Animal Models Of Hepatocarcinogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations