2021
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.641447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Immunomodulatory Evaluation of the Receptor Binding Domain of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein; a Potential Vaccine Candidate Which Imparts Potent Humoral and Th1 Type Immune Response in a Mouse Model

Abstract: The newly emerged novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19 has proven to be a threat to the human race globally, thus, vaccine development against SARS-CoV-2 is an unmet need driving mass vaccination efforts. The receptor binding domain of the spike protein of this coronavirus has multiple neutralizing epitopes and is associated with viral entry. Here we have designed and characterized the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein fragment 330-526 as receptor binding domain 330-526 (RBD330-526) with two n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
6
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies of RBD mutants with N‐terminal truncations that removed T323 also report monomer loss upon incubation at room temperature. [ 24 ] However, the capacity of RBD to interact with ACE2 was thereby not compromised, which is consistent with structural data demonstrating that T323 is not located in the proximity of the ACE2‐binding site. [ 12 ]…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Other studies of RBD mutants with N‐terminal truncations that removed T323 also report monomer loss upon incubation at room temperature. [ 24 ] However, the capacity of RBD to interact with ACE2 was thereby not compromised, which is consistent with structural data demonstrating that T323 is not located in the proximity of the ACE2‐binding site. [ 12 ]…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, only alum containing formulations resulted in detectable antibody titers after the first immunization. This result is in line with literature reporting low immunogenicity in mice after a single dose when RBD is formulated with AddaVax ( 51 54 ), but significant seroconversion titers after single dose when formulated with alum ( 41 , 54 ) or after two doses when formulated with AddaVax or AddaS03 ( 40 , 47 , 51 , 52 , 54 ). The overall response was dominated by the IgG1 subclass in all immunized groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, only alum containing formulations resulted in detectable antibody titers after the first immunization. This result is in line with literature reporting low immunogenicity in mice after a single dose when RBD is formulated with AddaVax [50][51][52][53] , but significant seroconversion titers after single dose when formulated with alum 40,53 or after two doses when formulated with AddaVax or AddaS03 39,46,50,51,53 . The overall response was dominated by the IgG1 subclass in all immunized groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%