2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2015.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative investigation of ‘survival’ and fatality factors in accidental residential fires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
87
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
87
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 11 included studies,12–16 28–33 5 were case–control designs,12 13 29 30 33 2 were cross-sectional31 32 and 4 were classified by the review authors as statistical analyses of routinely collected data 14–16 28. Ten of the included studies were published papers12–16 28–30 32 33 and one was an unpublished thesis 31.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 11 included studies,12–16 28–33 5 were case–control designs,12 13 29 30 33 2 were cross-sectional31 32 and 4 were classified by the review authors as statistical analyses of routinely collected data 14–16 28. Ten of the included studies were published papers12–16 28–30 32 33 and one was an unpublished thesis 31.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten of the included studies were published papers12–16 28–30 32 33 and one was an unpublished thesis 31. Seven studies were conducted in the USA,12–14 16 28 30 32 two in Australia,31 33 one in the UK15 and one in Canada 29.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bruck et al [1] reported that more than half of the adults (58%) who died in unintentional residential fires and were tested for alcohol recorded a positive BAC. Xiong et al [21] found that a third of the adults (24.8%) who died in accidental residential fires and were tested for drugs had consumed psychotropic and sedative drugs prior to the fire. The present less important relationships between these risk behaviours and survived fires can be partly attributed to the fact that only a small proportion of people interviewed reported that they had engaged in these risky behaviours, with most of them reporting to be awake and unimpaired at ignition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, fatal fires were more likely to have been caused by smoking, with adults over 50 years of age being at the highest risk [4,6]. By contrast, cooking has historically found to be the leading cause of most survived fires, in particular those that were extinguished without fire department assistance, and people aged [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] are twice as likely to be injured than the general public of all other ages [4,7]. These etiological differences between fatal and survived fires motivated the design of this study that aims to utilize the key concepts, human-agent-environment, of the Haddon Matrix to clearly organise relevant factors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%