2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Investigation on Tensile Performance of FRP Bars after Exposure to Water, Seawater, and Alkaline Solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After that, the strength degradation became slow in the further exposure period. This phenomenon was consistent with the exponential degradation models which believe that the degradation rate of tensile strength of GFRP bars is high in the initial stage, and then decreases with increasing exposure time [15,16,24]. Their degradation mechanisms related to GFRP bars are assumed to be debonding at the interface between fibers and matrix and they had been successfully applied to fit the short-term experimental data of tensile strength retention of GFRP bars immersed in environmental solutions [16,25].…”
Section: Tensile Strength Retentionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After that, the strength degradation became slow in the further exposure period. This phenomenon was consistent with the exponential degradation models which believe that the degradation rate of tensile strength of GFRP bars is high in the initial stage, and then decreases with increasing exposure time [15,16,24]. Their degradation mechanisms related to GFRP bars are assumed to be debonding at the interface between fibers and matrix and they had been successfully applied to fit the short-term experimental data of tensile strength retention of GFRP bars immersed in environmental solutions [16,25].…”
Section: Tensile Strength Retentionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…During the period of anchor installation, aluminum caps were settled at the edge of the anchors in order to close both ends of the steel pipe and ensure the bar placed in the center of the steel pipe. For the purpose of establishing an enough adhesive force between the GFRP bar and the anchor [15,16,21], the galvanized steel pipes were grouted with an epoxy resin of WSR618 (E-51) with the mass ratio (the epoxy resin to the curing agent) of 4:1. After a week, the conditioned GFRP bars were immersed in three prepared solution containers, as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Natural Aggressive Environmental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Steel corrosion is considered to be the primary cause for performance degradation of concrete structure, which results in high maintenance and reinforcement costs (Koch et al 2002;Ruan et al 2020;Lu et al 2020). In order to mitigate this problem and further improve the structural durability, fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) bar, as one new high-performance composite material made of continuous fiber and resin, is selected as one kind of internal reinforcing bar used in concrete structures, since FRP bars generally have the advantages of high stiffness weight ratio, high strength weight ratio, low cost performance ratio and excellent corrosion resistance (Robert et al 2009;Yan et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that up to 40% of the tensile strength of GFRP bars can be lost after exposure to a combination of ultraviolet rays and moisture tests with and without loading [ 47 ]. Tensile tests of GFRP, BFRP, and CFRP bars, made of vinyl ester resin, conducted after immersion in tap water (pH = 7.00) for 180 days, showed various degrees of degradation [ 48 ]. BFRP and CFRP bars retained nearly 89% of the tensile strength, while GFRP retained 78%.…”
Section: Durabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%