2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.0022-7722.2002.00002.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative investigations of human and rat dermatoglyphics: palmar, plantar and digital pads and flexion creases

Abstract: The morphological features of the palmar, plantar and digital areas of the rat were studied and compared to the corresponding human traits. The location and the timing of appearance of the volar pads and flexion creases of human and rat fetuses were investigated to determine the feasibility of using rats as an experimental model for studying the factors influencing early development of the dermatoglyphics in humans. Comparisons between analogous developmental stages of human and rat fetuses demonstrate strikin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite a general resemblance of the rat forepaw to the human hand (Kimura et al 2002), the absence of a functional thumb, the presence of sharply pointed pyramidallike pads on the palm and the absent fingerprints on the digit extremities constitute some significant differences (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Macroscopic Description Of the Forepaw Glabrous Skinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a general resemblance of the rat forepaw to the human hand (Kimura et al 2002), the absence of a functional thumb, the presence of sharply pointed pyramidallike pads on the palm and the absent fingerprints on the digit extremities constitute some significant differences (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Macroscopic Description Of the Forepaw Glabrous Skinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homologization of pads is complicated by the fact that their configuration differs from that of the studied mammalian species. The research describing the development of plantar and palmar pads has been carried out mainly in rats and humans (Kimura et al 1994(Kimura et al , 2002. Without developmental data, it is not possible to distinguish with certainty some of the components of pads formed by the thenar and hypothenar from those formed by the interdigital pads (Kimura et al 1994).…”
Section: External Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palm pads can be flat or bulging, depending on the substrate relief habitual to an animal. Formation of creases may be considered a subsequent, more advanced stage of the evolution of prehension, which is indirectly suggested by their late embryonic development relative to the pads (Swindler et al, 1968;Bali, 1994;Kimura et al, 2002). As the pads precede the creases both in evolution and in embryogenesis, topography of the former may be reasonably regarded as the basis for topography of the latter (Popich and Smith, 1970;Jeanty et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that human fetuses begin spontaneous hand movements no earlier than the 12th week of gestation (Humphrey, 1964). Hence, the primary flexion creases are acquired not as a consequence of the flexion movements of the palm but are preformed relative to their function (Wurth, 1937;Kimura et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%