“…Although longer time-series information is practically only available for radiocaesium, it has been argued that the specific affinities of soil and common urban construction materials for retaining caesium would imply that, if based on the same migration data, long-term dose estimates for other radionuclides would be somewhat conservative (Jones et al, 2006;Andersson et al, 2008a). For instance, a significantly higher ionic migration rate in soil for strontium has been recorded than for caesium (Salbu, 2000), and since cobalt ions are sorbed on the surfaces of clay minerals, and not fixed in selective sites (Norrish, 1975), also these would have a comparatively higher migration rate, as recorded experimentally by Solovitch-Vella and Garnier (2006).…”