2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative life cycle assessment of composite structures incorporating uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concrete production is susceptible to numerous uncertainties that can pose challenges to conducting a robust LCA, as highlighted by Zhao et al (2021). To address these uncertainties, a sensitivity analysis was conducted in this study to evaluate the impacts of some key factors such as high-temperature curing, emissions allocation scheme and PRAC formulation methods on the LCA outcomes.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concrete production is susceptible to numerous uncertainties that can pose challenges to conducting a robust LCA, as highlighted by Zhao et al (2021). To address these uncertainties, a sensitivity analysis was conducted in this study to evaluate the impacts of some key factors such as high-temperature curing, emissions allocation scheme and PRAC formulation methods on the LCA outcomes.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of bridge engineering, there is a need to further specify and present the cost estimation process for maintenance work, which is achieved by considering specific defect types, measures, and the material volumes used. Zhao et al [11] defined it such that each maintenance operation involves replacing 10% of the original materials, and the maintenance cost is calculated based on the volume of material replacement. However, the cost of maintenance measures not only includes material costs, but also encompasses expenses related to labor, machinery, and other factors such as regional rates.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does not follow the Weibull distribution. By substituting the Weibull parameters into Equation (11), the durations of the elements in each state can be obtained, as shown in the table. The durations in Table 8 represent the total time that bridge elements stay in multiple states without maintenance.…”
Section: Duration Of Each Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most significant sources of uncertainties reported in the studies were uncertainty in model and process parameters, data variability, and uncertainty due to using different methodologies and databases. Uniform [34,41,57,65,70,95,110,113] Beta [57,96,116] Gamma [41,67] BETA-PERT […”
Section: Sources Of Uncertainty and Pdfsmentioning
confidence: 99%