2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative measurements of external radiation exposure using mobile phones, dental ceramic, household salt and conventional personal dosemeters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…also suggested a SAR measurement protocol for the detection of the absorbed radiation dose by the glass display of mobile phones, which incorporates their TL response (temperature up to 450 o C). Similarly, Ekendahl et al (2015) have also suggested a SAR protocol for the dose reconstruction in alumina resistors and dental ceramic, which however includes preheating the sample at a temperature higher than 120 o C and/or its TL response (temperature up to 450 o C).…”
Section: Protocols For the Calculation Of The Absorbed Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…also suggested a SAR measurement protocol for the detection of the absorbed radiation dose by the glass display of mobile phones, which incorporates their TL response (temperature up to 450 o C). Similarly, Ekendahl et al (2015) have also suggested a SAR protocol for the dose reconstruction in alumina resistors and dental ceramic, which however includes preheating the sample at a temperature higher than 120 o C and/or its TL response (temperature up to 450 o C).…”
Section: Protocols For the Calculation Of The Absorbed Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in materials exhibiting sensitization, appropriate sensitivity corrections have to be made, administering a test dose between the various calibration doses (e.g. Ekendahl et al, 2015).…”
Section: Protocols For the Calculation Of The Absorbed Dosementioning
confidence: 99%