2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative meta-analysis and experimental kinetic investigation of column and batch bottle microcosm treatability studies informing in situ groundwater remedial design

Abstract: A systematic comparison was performed between batch bottle and continuous-flow column microcosms (BMs and CMs, respectively) commonly used for in situ groundwater remedial design. Review of recent literature (2000–2014) showed a preference for reporting batch kinetics, even when corresponding column data were available. Additionally, CMs produced higher observed rate constants, exceeding those of BMs by a factor of 6.1 ± 1.1 standard error. In a subsequent laboratory investigation, 12 equivalent microcosm pair… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, with flowthrough columns, it is also possible to determine amendment lifetimes by tracking contaminant rebound in column effluent. These amendment lifetimes provide an additional metric for estimating cleanup times [34].…”
Section: Embodiment Of the Ismamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, with flowthrough columns, it is also possible to determine amendment lifetimes by tracking contaminant rebound in column effluent. These amendment lifetimes provide an additional metric for estimating cleanup times [34].…”
Section: Embodiment Of the Ismamentioning
confidence: 99%