2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-021-00132-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative mitogenomics of Drosophilidae and the evolution of the Zygothrica genus group (Diptera, Drosophilidae)

Abstract: The Zygothrica genus group of Drosophilidae encompasses more than 437 species and five genera. Although knowledge regarding its diversity has increased, uncertainties about its monophyly and position within Drosophilidae remain. Genomic approaches have been widely used to address different phylogenetic questions and analyses involving the mitogenome have revealed a cost-efficient tool to these studies. Thus, this work aims to characterize mitogenomes of three species of the Zygothrica genus group (from the Hir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loss of the DHU arm in tRNAs has been detected in various Lepidoptera species [ 6 , 38 , 39 ]. DHU lacking arm was hypothesized to have evolved in response to recognition signals for seryl-tRNA synthetases, reflecting potential differences in gene expression [ 40 , 41 ]. The location of rrnL is between trnV and trnL1 , while rrnS is detected between the control region and trnV .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss of the DHU arm in tRNAs has been detected in various Lepidoptera species [ 6 , 38 , 39 ]. DHU lacking arm was hypothesized to have evolved in response to recognition signals for seryl-tRNA synthetases, reflecting potential differences in gene expression [ 40 , 41 ]. The location of rrnL is between trnV and trnL1 , while rrnS is detected between the control region and trnV .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even within the genomics era, mtDNA data remain a useful and cost‐efficient molecular marker, especially for preliminary species delimitation and identification, and for estimating levels of population structure, gene flow, and demographic history. The sequencing of complete insect mitogenomes has become more frequent (Bessa et al, 2021; X. Feng et al, 2022; Ruiz‐Mena et al, 2022; Tang et al, 2019; Yamasaki et al, 2020; Q. H. Zhang, Huang, et al, 2018; C. Zhang, Rabiee, et al, 2018) but comparative studies testing the phylogenetic utility of mitogenomes as a whole (Wei et al, 2010) or the relative performance of different mtDNA genes are scarce for invertebrate groups in general (for few exceptions, see Havird & Santos, 2014; Seixas et al, 2016; Talavera & Vila, 2011). This is problematic because a better understanding of mtDNA properties is essential for the application of mtDNA for molecular systematics (Dong et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even within the genomics era, mtDNA data remain a useful and cost-efficient molecular marker, especially for preliminary species delimitation and identification, and for estimating levels of population structure, gene flow, and demographic history. The sequencing of complete insect mitogenomes has become more frequent (Bessa et al, 2021;X. Feng et al, 2022;Ruiz-Mena et al, 2022;Tang et al, 2019;Yamasaki et al, 2020;Q.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%