2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-016-6118-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative modelling of laboratory experiments for the hydro-mechanical behaviour of a compacted bentonite–sand mixture

Abstract: A comparative modelling exercise involving several independent teams from the DECOVALEX-2015 project is presented in this paper. The exercise is based on various laboratory experiments that have been carried out in the framework of a French research program called SEALEX and conducted by the IRSN. The program focuses on the long-term performance of swelling clay-based sealing systems that provide an important contribution to the safety of underground nuclear waste disposal facilities. A number of materials are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gradient of the stress development matches sensor AS_000, but does not predict the non-symmetry stress development between the two sample ends. However, the physical reason for the dissymmetry in axial stress is not known (Millard et al 2016). For example, it could be an experimental difference in stress conditions at each end of the sample, such as an unaccounted for void into which the bentonite was able to expand, rather than a physical process occurring within the sample during hydration.…”
Section: Results Of Modelling the Pt-a1 Performance Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gradient of the stress development matches sensor AS_000, but does not predict the non-symmetry stress development between the two sample ends. However, the physical reason for the dissymmetry in axial stress is not known (Millard et al 2016). For example, it could be an experimental difference in stress conditions at each end of the sample, such as an unaccounted for void into which the bentonite was able to expand, rather than a physical process occurring within the sample during hydration.…”
Section: Results Of Modelling the Pt-a1 Performance Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rapid hydration observed at the lowest sensor (red) is under predicted. This is a common problem throughout the modelling teams in the DECO-VALEX-2015 task (see summary paper this issue, Millard et al 2016) and could be due to the permeability model not capturing the full range of permeability change associated with the hydration or the use of a single unique water retention curve to describe the water content-suctionstress relationship rather than specifically addressing the different scales of porosity.…”
Section: Infiltration Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two synthesis papers provide summary findings for comparative modeling of the laboratory and mock-up studies (Millard et al 2016)…”
Section: The Sealex Experiment: Hm Processes In Bentonite-based Sealimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constitutive modeling of expansive soils has mainly considered bentonites as buffer materials in waste disposal facilities. Based on various experimental results assuming the condition during the in‐service period of the facilities, an empirical model in which the swelling behavior is directly given by the relationship between suction and volumetric strain has been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%