1984
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90293-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative observations of the use of cusp and zero-degree posterior teeth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant difference was noted in maximum occlusal force between occlusal schemes detectable with the dental prescale. Although other studies that used subjective methods to evaluate chewing ability between different occlusal schemes reported inconsistent results, [23][24][25][26]28 in this study, the patients' preferences for an occlusal scheme could not be related to masticatory performance when measured objectively. The present study evaluated the masticatory performance and maximum occlusal force objectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No significant difference was noted in maximum occlusal force between occlusal schemes detectable with the dental prescale. Although other studies that used subjective methods to evaluate chewing ability between different occlusal schemes reported inconsistent results, [23][24][25][26]28 in this study, the patients' preferences for an occlusal scheme could not be related to masticatory performance when measured objectively. The present study evaluated the masticatory performance and maximum occlusal force objectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…7,9,12,15,[20][21][22] Results of studies have shown different results for different study designs, which have led to controversy in the outcomes. 20,[23][24][25][26][27] Uncontrolled factors in previous studies include the intaglio surface of complete dentures and the altered vertical dimension with different denture bases. A few intra-individual studies with the same denture base have also been performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“… Preference for cusped teeth and balanced occlusion Trapozzano & Lazzari (1952, 1959)(4); Shetty (1984)(4). Preference for cuspless teeth Payne (2005)(4). No difference in patient outcomes with cusped or cuspless teeth Woelfel et al (1962)(3b); Brewer et al (1967)(4); Berg (1988)(1b). Preference for lingualised design Lang & Razzoog (1983)(2c); Clough et al (1983)(2c); Denissen et al (1993); Masari et al (2002)(2c); Lang (2004)(3a); Ohnuki et al (2005); Kimoto et al (2006)(2b); Sutton et al (2005)(1a). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, nonanatomic ones do not have a straight occlusal plane with cusp inclination at 0°. 9 Sutton et al 6 and Shetty 10 reported that nonanatomic teeth reduce lateral stress, minimize the masticatory load, and allow freer lateral movement without treatment, thus promoting better prosthesis stability, which would imply smaller TMJ effort. This study aims to report a case of an association between surgical treatment of temporomandibular dysfunction and total prosthesis (TP) rehabilitation using nonanatomic teeth in patients with recurrent anterior dislocation of the TMJ and persistent involuntary mandibular movement.…”
Section: 5005/jp-journals-10024-2042mentioning
confidence: 99%