2017
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative outcomes of immunochemotherapy regimens in Waldenström macroglobulinaemia

Abstract: Comparative data on immunochemotherapy regimens for Waldenström macroglobulinaemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (WM/LPL) are lacking. We analysed overall survival (OS), risk of hospitalizations, transfusions and plasmapheresis in a population-based cohort of patients ≥65 years old initiating WM/LPL therapy in 1999-2013. To minimize bias, we applied a propensity score-based causal inference method. We conducted three analyses of: patients treated with or without rituximab, patients treated with rituximab monother… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This definition mirrors prior studies using Medicare data, with the exception that some analyses defined the anchoring window as 30 days before death only. [18][19][20][21] We found that such an anchoring produces incorrect results due to guarantee-time bias in TD ascertainment (supplemental Figure 1, available on the Blood Web site). To assess the sensitivity of our results and illustrate bias in prior studies, we repeated all analyses using alternative criteria: $3 transfusions within 60 days or $4 transfusions within 90 days.…”
Section: Variables and End Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This definition mirrors prior studies using Medicare data, with the exception that some analyses defined the anchoring window as 30 days before death only. [18][19][20][21] We found that such an anchoring produces incorrect results due to guarantee-time bias in TD ascertainment (supplemental Figure 1, available on the Blood Web site). To assess the sensitivity of our results and illustrate bias in prior studies, we repeated all analyses using alternative criteria: $3 transfusions within 60 days or $4 transfusions within 90 days.…”
Section: Variables and End Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 We identified chemotherapy administration recorded in Medicare claims, as previously described, with the caveat that the use of oral agents (including palliative hydroxyurea, oral chlorambucil, or tyrosine kinase inhibitors) was not consistently observed. 21,24,25 Explanatory variables included patient's age, sex, race/ethnicity (according to Medicare files), marital status, receipt of Medicaid coinsurance (indicator of disability or poverty), county-level indicators of population size and poverty prevalence, the National Cancer Institute-modified Charlson comorbidity index (a weighted score of comorbidities associated with mortality, based on Medicare claims from 12 months preceding death or hospice enrollment), preexisting dementia, indicator of poor performance status (validated as a measure of self-reported functional status), histological type of leukemia, time from diagnosis to death, and year of death. 24,26,27…”
Section: Variables and End Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its recommended use is in combination therapy, as response rates in monotherapy were modest [overall response rate (ORR) of 52%, and major response rate (MRR) of 27%, in 69 untreated and previously treated WM patients] (Dimopoulos et al , ; Gertz et al , ). However, single agent rituximab is used for frail patients with high comorbidities or when symptomatology is due to autoimmune activity of the paraprotein IgM (Olszewski et al , ).…”
Section: How Do We Treat Wm?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a 10‐year OS rate of 86% in young WM patients, one could argue that OS might not be an optimal outcome of interest in these patients. Not surprisingly, OS benefits have not been apparent with any intervention in population‐based or randomized studies (Olszewski et al , ; Dimopoulos et al , ). Despite the limitations of this study (i.e.…”
Section: Clinical Characteristics At Diagnosis and At Primary Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%