2021
DOI: 10.5152/electrica.2021.20077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Performance Analysis of Slime Mould Algorithm For Efficient Design of Proportional–Integral–Derivative Controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
41
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several examples of such algorithms for PID controller design can be encountered in the literature due to this advantage. Some of them are: gravitational search algorithm (Duman et al, 2011), Harris hawks optimization algorithm (Ekinci et al, 2020b), kidney-inspired algorithm (Hekimoğlu, 2019b), flower pollination algorithm (Potnuru et al, 2019), grey wolf optimization algorithm (Bhatnagar and Gupta, 2018), invasive weed optimization algorithm (Khalilpour et al, 2011), genetic algorithm (El-Deen et al, 2015), stochastic fractal search algorithm (Khanam and Parmar, 2017), teaching–learning-based optimization (Mishra et al, 2020), ant colony optimization (Kouassi et al, 2020), swarm learning process (Pongfai et al, 2020), particle swarm optimization (Sabir and Khan, 2014), water cycle algorithm (Mohamed et al, 2020), sine cosine algorithm (Agarwal et al, 2018b) and its improved version (Ekinci et al, 2019) along with slime mould algorithm (Izci and Ekinci, 2021) and hybrid atom search optimization with simulated annealing algorithm (Eker et al, 2021). Further improvement on PID controller design can still be achieved despite the promising results obtained by the abovementioned algorithms since there is a dizzying effort in terms of development of new metaheuristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several examples of such algorithms for PID controller design can be encountered in the literature due to this advantage. Some of them are: gravitational search algorithm (Duman et al, 2011), Harris hawks optimization algorithm (Ekinci et al, 2020b), kidney-inspired algorithm (Hekimoğlu, 2019b), flower pollination algorithm (Potnuru et al, 2019), grey wolf optimization algorithm (Bhatnagar and Gupta, 2018), invasive weed optimization algorithm (Khalilpour et al, 2011), genetic algorithm (El-Deen et al, 2015), stochastic fractal search algorithm (Khanam and Parmar, 2017), teaching–learning-based optimization (Mishra et al, 2020), ant colony optimization (Kouassi et al, 2020), swarm learning process (Pongfai et al, 2020), particle swarm optimization (Sabir and Khan, 2014), water cycle algorithm (Mohamed et al, 2020), sine cosine algorithm (Agarwal et al, 2018b) and its improved version (Ekinci et al, 2019) along with slime mould algorithm (Izci and Ekinci, 2021) and hybrid atom search optimization with simulated annealing algorithm (Eker et al, 2021). Further improvement on PID controller design can still be achieved despite the promising results obtained by the abovementioned algorithms since there is a dizzying effort in terms of development of new metaheuristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The novel improved slime mould algorithm (ISMA) was proposed as a better tool to maintain the terminal voltage of an automatic voltage regulator (AVR) system and controlling the output speed of a direct current (DC) motor. The AVR and the DC motor systems have so far been heavily adopted as real-world engineering problems for assessing the performance of metaheuristic algorithms (Izci and Ekinci, 2021). The DC motor is a second order system whereas the AVR is a higher order complex system, thus, they are good candidates to observe the performance of the metaheuristic algorithms from a wider perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed ISMA based FOPID controller for DC motor speed control system was compared with other available and effective approaches of manta ray foraging optimization (Ekinci et al, 2021b), chaotic atom search optimization algorithm (Hekimoğlu, 2019a), atom search optimization (Hekimoğlu, 2019a), stochastic fractal search algorithm (Saini et al, 2020), grey wolf optimization (Agarwal et al, 2018) based FOPID controllers and Lévy flight distribution with Nelder–Mead algorithm (Izci, 2021), Harris–Hawks optimization (Ekinci et al, 2020b), Henry gas solubility optimization (Ekinci et al, 2021a), SMA (Izci and Ekinci, 2021), atom search optimization (Hekimoğlu, 2019a), grey wolf optimization (Agarwal et al, 2018), stochastic fractal search algorithm (Bhatt et al, 2019), kidney-inspired algorithm (Hekimoğlu, 2019b), sine–cosine algorithm (Agarwal et al, 2017), invasive weed optimization algorithm (Khalilpour et al, 2011), and particle swarm optimization (Khalilpour et al, 2011) based PID controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMA has a unique search mode, which keeps the algorithm from falling into local optima, and has superior global exploration capability. The approach has been applied in real-world optimization problems like feature selection [ 36 ], parameters optimization of the fuzzy system [ 37 ], multilevel threshold image segmentation [ 38 ], control scheme [ 39 ], and parallel connected multistacks fuel cells [ 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%