2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Performance Evaluation of Steel Column Building & Concrete Filled Tube Column Building under Static and Dynamic Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Penggunaan kolom CST yang lebih tebal, lebih kuat and lebih besar tidak berperan signifikan dalam ketahanan material ini terhadap gempa. (Tailor, et al, 2017) melakukan evaluasi seismik terhadap bangunan tinggi dengan CFST yang menunjukkan hasil bahwa bangunan tersebut memiliki kinerja lebih baik daripada rangka baja dalam menahan gaya lateral. Konstruksi dan sambungan CFST juga lebih mudah jika menggunakan tabung persegi daripada silinder.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Penggunaan kolom CST yang lebih tebal, lebih kuat and lebih besar tidak berperan signifikan dalam ketahanan material ini terhadap gempa. (Tailor, et al, 2017) melakukan evaluasi seismik terhadap bangunan tinggi dengan CFST yang menunjukkan hasil bahwa bangunan tersebut memiliki kinerja lebih baik daripada rangka baja dalam menahan gaya lateral. Konstruksi dan sambungan CFST juga lebih mudah jika menggunakan tabung persegi daripada silinder.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…According to the results, the CFT structure is well in load capacity with a small cross-sectional area of the carrier column [1]. Tailor et al (2017) conducted a study aimed to evaluate the comparative performance of building steel columns and concrete-filled tube columns under static and dynamic loads. They replaced and investigated the columns of steel building were replaced with concrete-filled tube columns with two circular and square sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, they compared seismic performance of both frames. They concluded that the seismic performance of concrete-filled steel pipe (CFST) of the column frame was better than steel frames in both static and dynamic loading and it's also proven to be more affordable than steel frame [2]. Jamaluddin et al (2013), conducted an in vitro study on a concrete-filled elliptical column under axial pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%