2012
DOI: 10.1080/11250003.2011.651163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative phylogeography of the five Greek vole species infers the existence of multiple South Balkan subrefugia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first group corresponds to sister lineages that segregated recently and show evidence of past hybridization (Bastos‐Silveira, Santos, Monarca, Mathias, & Heckel, ). The second group includes relatively few sequences of a much diverged lineage (Thanou, Tryfonopoulos, Chondropoulos, & Fraguedakis‐Tsolis, ), but morphometric analysis was also unable to discriminate them (Kryštufek & Vohralík, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group corresponds to sister lineages that segregated recently and show evidence of past hybridization (Bastos‐Silveira, Santos, Monarca, Mathias, & Heckel, ). The second group includes relatively few sequences of a much diverged lineage (Thanou, Tryfonopoulos, Chondropoulos, & Fraguedakis‐Tsolis, ), but morphometric analysis was also unable to discriminate them (Kryštufek & Vohralík, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors also stated that Microtus dogramacii (Kefelioğlu & Kryštufek 1999), which is distributed in western Anatolia with 2n = 48 chromosomes, and Microtus guentheri are closely related species. Similarly, Thanou et al (2012) considered the Greece, Turkish Thrace and western Anatolia populations to be Microtus hartingi and the Syria and Israel populations to be Microtus guentheri based on the cytochrome-b gene. Yiğit et al (2012) examined features of the fur, skull and baculum and suggested that the Bulgaria and Turkish Thrace populations be classified as Microtus hartingi according to the priority rule, and they named the western Anatolia populations Microtus lydius as a valid taxon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The voles of the "Guentheri Group" are species with 2n = 54 chromosomes (Golenishchev et al 2002), and it has traditionally been accepted that Microtus guentheri (Danford & Alston 1880), whose type location is Türkoğlu (Kahramanmaraş Province, Turkey), is distributed in the southeastern Balkans, Turkey, Syria, Israel and a limited area of northern Lebanon (Ellerman & Morrison-Scott 1951;Niethammer & Krapp 1982;Harrison 1991;Wilson & Reeder 2005;Aulagnier 2009). Nevertheless, morphological, karyological and systematic studies have revealed the complex taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships among the species in the Guentheri Group Kryštufek et al , 2012Thanou et al 2012;Yiğit et al 2012;Zima et al 2013;Markov et al 2014). Based on these studies, the three major taxonomic factors defining the Turkish Guentheri Group are as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Communication between the populations of Strandhza and Rhodopes Mountain is not established. Probably the voles from Rhodopes locality are closely with these from neighboring Greece, where the M. h. hartingi subspecies range is narrow, but there is evidence that the voles are settled and expanded its territory (Thanou et al, 2012). Therefore, new data are needed to explain the mechanisms that have led to the current interspecies' structure of the species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%