2016
DOI: 10.1002/cpbi.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER

Abstract: Comparative protein structure modeling predicts the three-dimensional structure of a given protein sequence (target) based primarily on its alignment to one or more proteins of known structure (templates). The prediction process consists of fold assignment, target-template alignment, model building, and model evaluation. This unit describes how to calculate comparative models using the program MODELLER and how to use the ModBase database of such models, and discusses all four steps of comparative modeling, fre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
2,713
0
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,261 publications
(2,727 citation statements)
references
References 273 publications
3
2,713
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The three-dimensional model of BRP MBL was built using Modeler v9.16 (28), with the structure of BMLT (PDB code 1EWJ) as the template (13). The structure was constructed as a dimer, with two bleomycin molecules positioned at the interface of the monomers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three-dimensional model of BRP MBL was built using Modeler v9.16 (28), with the structure of BMLT (PDB code 1EWJ) as the template (13). The structure was constructed as a dimer, with two bleomycin molecules positioned at the interface of the monomers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All parts were assembled to an overall alignment. Modeller version 9.14 was used to construct the 3D structure of TRPL (Webb and Sali 2016). The pipeline was built up by self-defined python scripts, for which all atom types, except of water molecules, were considered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final alignment was generated using CLUSTALX (version 2.1) 141-146 , showing a good match in helices S5, S6, and the pore region, with identity about 44% (Figure 2). After automatic model building and loop refinement, candidate models were evaluated based on the DOPE score from MODELLER (version 9.15) 141-145, 147 . The final homology model of the hERG K + channel is shown in Figure 3, which is found to be highly consistent with a previously reported homology model based on a slightly different procedure 143, 148-150 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%