2011
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(11)60104-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative radiopacity of ceramics and metals with human and bovine dental tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiopacity is a desirable property of dental materials, including direct-filling restorative materials (1-3, 5, 10-15), cavity liners (11)(12)(13)(14), core build-up materials (12,16), luting agents (3,13,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), adhesive systems (21), root canal filling materials (10,22), provisional crown and bridge materials (23), and ceramic restorative materials (24,25). The localization of radiolucent dental materials may not be detected if they are aspirated or impacted in the soft tissue because of trauma or iatrogenic reasons (7,26,27).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Radiopacity is a desirable property of dental materials, including direct-filling restorative materials (1-3, 5, 10-15), cavity liners (11)(12)(13)(14), core build-up materials (12,16), luting agents (3,13,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), adhesive systems (21), root canal filling materials (10,22), provisional crown and bridge materials (23), and ceramic restorative materials (24,25). The localization of radiolucent dental materials may not be detected if they are aspirated or impacted in the soft tissue because of trauma or iatrogenic reasons (7,26,27).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have revealed that the radiopacity level of dental materials is critical and should depend on the purpose of the dental restorative material being used (3,6,20,24). On the other hand, highly radiopaque materials may cause a Mach effect and result in false positive or negative discrimination (30).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations