2016
DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Research with Net and Gross Income Data: An Evaluation of Two Netting Down Procedures for the LIS Database

Abstract: Researchers seeking to perform country-comparative and trend analyses using income data have to account for the fact that income surveys differ in whether income is measured gross or net of taxes and contributions. We discuss, develop, and evaluate two`netting down procedures' for data in the LIS Database. Evaluations of these netting down procedures indicate that comparisons across gross and net datasets can be greatly improved when netting down procedures are applied. In several cases, however, substantial a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it has been well documented that women’s earnings attenuate rather than exacerbate earnings inequality among coupled households (Gregory, 2009). This means that trends in women’s earnings and of economic inequality are intrinsically linked at the household level (Harkness, 2013; Lam, 1997; Nieuwenhuis et al, 2017). As women’s earnings (on average) have been rising over time, with more women being employed and having gained stronger positions in the labour market with higher status positions and higher wages (Costa, 2000), and as the number of women without earnings of their own declined, the attenuating effect of their earnings on household inequality increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it has been well documented that women’s earnings attenuate rather than exacerbate earnings inequality among coupled households (Gregory, 2009). This means that trends in women’s earnings and of economic inequality are intrinsically linked at the household level (Harkness, 2013; Lam, 1997; Nieuwenhuis et al, 2017). As women’s earnings (on average) have been rising over time, with more women being employed and having gained stronger positions in the labour market with higher status positions and higher wages (Costa, 2000), and as the number of women without earnings of their own declined, the attenuating effect of their earnings on household inequality increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LIS database allows scholars to access the microdata, so that income inequality measures and fiscal redistribution (and the partial effect per social programme) can be derived consistently from the underlying data at the individual and household level. LIS microdata seem to be the best available data for describing how income inequality and the redistributive effects of income taxes and social transfers vary across countries and over time (Nolan and Marx, ; Smeeding and Latner, ; Nieuwenhuis, Munzi and Gornick, ). We apply a cross‐national analysis using comparable income surveys for all countries of LIS from 1982–2014.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where available, earnings net of taxes and social security contributions were used and when necessary net earnings were calculated by subtracting taxes and social security contributions from gross earnings. Procedures for doing this are described in detail by Nieuwenhuis et al (2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%