Comparative Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome

Abstract

Background Patient-reported questionnaires have been widely used to predict symptom severity and functional disability in musculoskeletal disease. Importantly, questionnaires can detect clinical changes in patients; however, this impact has not been determined for ulnar impaction syndrome. Questions/purposes We asked (1) which of Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), DASH, and other physical measures was more responsive to clinical improvements, and (2) what was the minimal clinically important difference for the PRWE and DASH after ulnar shortening osteotomy for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. Methods All patients who underwent ulnar shortening osteotomy between March 2008 and February 2011 for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome were enrolled in this study. All patients completed the PRWE and DASH questionnaires, and all were evaluated for grip strength and wrist ROM, preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. We compared the effect sizes observed by each of these instruments. Effect size is calculated by dividing the mean change in a score of each instrument during a specified interval by the standard deviation of the baseline score. In addition, patient-perceived overall improvement was used as the anchor to determine the minimal clinically important differences on the PRWE and DASH 12 months after surgery. Results The average score of each item except for wrist flexion and supination improved after surgery. The PRWE was more sensitive than the DASH or than physical measurements in detecting clinical changes. The effect sizes and standardized response means of the outcome measures were as follows: PRWE (1.51, 1.64), DASH (1.12, 1.24), grip strength (0.59, 0.68), wrist pronation (0.33, 0.41), and wrist extension (0.28, 0.36). Patient-perceived overall improvement and score changes of the PRWE and DASH correlated significantly. Minimal clinically important differences were 17 points (of a possible 100) for the PRWE and 13.5 for the DASH (also of 100), and minimal detectable changes were 7.7 points for the PRWE and 9.3 points for the DASH. Conclusions Although the PRWE and DASH were highly sensitive to clinical changes, the PRWE was more sensitive in terms of detecting clinical changes after ulnar shortening osteotomy for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. A minimal change of 17 PRWE points or 13.5 DASH points was necessary to achieve a benefit that patients perceived as clinically important. The minimal clinically important differences using these instruments were higher than the values produced by measurement errors.

Statistics In Brief: Minimum Clinically Important Difference—Availability of Reliable Estimates

“…The application of MCIDs in clinical research has been difficult largely owing to various methods for estimating them [5,14,15]. Wright et al [35] enumerates nine possible methods that can be divided in two possible Each author certifies that he, or a member of his immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.…”

Total hip arthroplasty in an outpatient setting in 27 selected patients

“…The scoring of these questions varied from 1 (deteriorated very much since surgery) to 7 (improved very much since surgery). Anchor-based methods compare changes in scores on the instrument with an anchor, where the patients indicate whether they believe they are better than at baseline (Kim and Park 2013). …”

Is Arthroscopic Bone Graft and Fixation for Scaphoid Nonunions Effective?

“…The level of significance was set at p\0.05. To demonstrate the effectiveness of a treatment, a minimal clinically important difference in VAS scores for pain has been reported ranging from 0.9 to 1.4 [9,19,28] and, in DASH score, ranging from 7 to 13.5 [11,20,21]. However, other measurements do not have the reported minimal clinically significant differences.…”