Comparative Review of Environmental Audit Tools for Public Open Spaces from the Perspective of Children’s Activity

Abstract

Public open spaces are important venues for children’s participation in outdoor activities and social life. This study performs a comparative and qualitative review of the tools that can be used to audit the environments of children-focused public open spaces. The analysis reviews 25 studies involving 11 tools for comparison. The results reveal that (1) the tools were developed in different fields; (2) the tools use two data resources, field investigation and geographic databases; (3) the tool dimensions are diverse, as are the number of items covered, and are generally related to four categories: surrounding environment and accessibility, activity and perceived safety, children’s sports and play opportunities, and aesthetic and comfort of the environment; (4) the reliability of most tools has been verified, with some validity still to be confirmed; (5) there are differences in tool users, settings, and aims. Among the tools, the CPAT and the EAPRS are the most comprehensive. Comparative analysis of the tools provides a reference for studies on children-focused public open spaces and for the development and improvement of corresponding tools in the future.

The Impact of a Child-Friendly Design on Children’s Activities in Urban Community Pocket Parks

“…After reviewing 25 studies across 11 sources, Chinese scholar Xue Meng identified several factors that influence child-friendly pocket parks. These factors can be broadly classified as follows: the environment and its accessibility, the perceived level of safety and opportunities for physical activity and recreation, and the visual attractiveness and comfort of the surrounding area [17].…”